Re: What's wrong with this picture?
From: Nick Thomas (N.J.Thomas_at_rl.ac.uk)
Date: 06/28/04
- Next message: Charles Eicher: "Re: What's wrong with this picture?"
- Previous message: Aki Moilanen: "Re: What's wrong with this picture?"
- In reply to: Aki Moilanen: "Re: What's wrong with this picture?"
- Next in thread: Charles Eicher: "Re: What's wrong with this picture?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:54:42 +0100
"Aki Moilanen" <akmoilan@paju.oulu.fi> wrote in message
news:cbpk8m$ngr$1@ousrvr3.oulu.fi...
> necoandjeff <spam@schrepfer.com> wrote:
> > "Curt Fischer" <crf3@po.cwru.edu> wrote in message
> > > I'm not as sure about 2 and 3 but 6 definitely looks wrong to me.
>
> > I agree. 6 definitely looks wrong.
>
> It still looks right to me. You know, it's a totally different type of
> a stroke than 5 (as it should be). Maybe check WWWJDIC's SOD-gif?
>
> Aki Moilanen
They all look fine to me,,,, but then i tried
shodou and so wouldn't dare slag anyone else off.
I did notice that the white gaps in the ink don't follow the presumed
direction of stroke for strokes 2 and 3,, nor a backward stroke for
that matter. There'd have to be some sort of brush rotation going on to
get that effect,,, but the gaps appear to be on a fairly linear
(equi-girthed)
section of the line.
Could i be getting at something here?
Nick
- Next message: Charles Eicher: "Re: What's wrong with this picture?"
- Previous message: Aki Moilanen: "Re: What's wrong with this picture?"
- In reply to: Aki Moilanen: "Re: What's wrong with this picture?"
- Next in thread: Charles Eicher: "Re: What's wrong with this picture?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|