Re: Q=24B=40=3ANO=1B=28B?=
jim_breen_at_idontreadhotmail.com
Date: 07/06/04
- Next message: Adam Atkinson: "Re: conversation partner"
- Previous message: Bart Mathias: "Re: $B@:NO(B"
- In reply to: necoandjeff: "Re: $B@:NO(B"
- Next in thread: Bart Mathias: "Re: $B@:NO(B"
- Reply: Bart Mathias: "Re: $B@:NO(B"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 04:35:25 GMT
necoandjeff <spam@schrepfer.com> dixit:
>Generally, combining a verb and a noun as you had in mind would only involve
>the base of the verb (just like tabemono and kaimono.)
Generally yes, but for $B$+$$$b$N(B you have $BGcJ*(B and $BGc$$J*(B. Dictionaries
are divided on the form they give (Daijirin has $BGc(B($B$$(B)$BJ*(B). According
to Google $BGc$$J*(B leads $BGcJ*(B by about 2:1.
>There is a word $B8+J*(B.
Worse than that - there's two of them: $B$1$s$V$D(B and $B$_$b$N(B.
-- Jim Breen http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/ Computer Science & Software Engineering, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia $B%8%`!&%V%j!<%s(B@$B%b%J%7%eBg3X(B
- Next message: Adam Atkinson: "Re: conversation partner"
- Previous message: Bart Mathias: "Re: $B@:NO(B"
- In reply to: necoandjeff: "Re: $B@:NO(B"
- Next in thread: Bart Mathias: "Re: $B@:NO(B"
- Reply: Bart Mathias: "Re: $B@:NO(B"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]