Re: ad hominem argument
From: Kevin Gowen (kgowenNOSPAM_at_myfastmail.com)
Date: 08/06/04
- Next message: necoandjeff: "Re: bit by ants"
- Previous message: necoandjeff: "Re: bit by ants"
- In reply to: necoandjeff: "Re: ad hominem argument"
- Next in thread: necoandjeff: "Re: ad hominem argument"
- Reply: necoandjeff: "Re: ad hominem argument"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 20:51:58 -0400
necoandjeff wrote:
> "Kevin Gowen" <kgowenNOSPAM@myfastmail.com> wrote in message
> news:2nfur0FgiflU1@uni-berlin.de...
>
>
>>Well, please let me know what you decide. As I said before, the
>>translation is done; I just need a gracious proofreader for chapters 5-7.
>
>
> Any particular reason why my gracious offer is being ignored?
I'm sorry that you weren't getting enough attention. I'm trying to find
the document. I've recently moved and I've not worked on the project in
over a year, so I'm sorry if you thought my taking more than 16 hours to
locate and transmit the draft to you meant that I was ignoring you.
I am now advised that the limit for gracious acceptance of a gracious
offer is 16 hours, after which point the gracious offeror becomes
ungracious.
- Kevin
- Next message: necoandjeff: "Re: bit by ants"
- Previous message: necoandjeff: "Re: bit by ants"
- In reply to: necoandjeff: "Re: ad hominem argument"
- Next in thread: necoandjeff: "Re: ad hominem argument"
- Reply: necoandjeff: "Re: ad hominem argument"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|