Re: Most Komplex Kanji ?
From: Paul Blay (ranma_at_saotome.demon.co.uk)
Date: 09/06/04
- Next message: necoandjeff: "Re: Bizarre"
- Previous message: Paul Blay: "Re: Most Komplex Kanji ?"
- In reply to: Smith: "Re: Most Komplex Kanji ?"
- Next in thread: Don Kirkman: "Re: Most Komplex Kanji ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 04:26:53 +0100
"Smith" wrote ...
> Paul Blay wrote:
> > Those are good reasons. But those aren't the reasons you post
> > in unicode.
>
> Paul you really are paranoid aren't you. Get back on the medication.
Sheesh.
Those reasons are very good reasons for posting in unicode a post
/that contains/ some 日本語 and some tiếng Việt , Español , Français etc..
If his post does not contain some 日本語 and some tiếng Việt , Español ,
Français etc.. then it is no longer a significant reason for using it.
- Next message: necoandjeff: "Re: Bizarre"
- Previous message: Paul Blay: "Re: Most Komplex Kanji ?"
- In reply to: Smith: "Re: Most Komplex Kanji ?"
- Next in thread: Don Kirkman: "Re: Most Komplex Kanji ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|