Re: EDICT yabai (Was Re: $B!VE,Ev$J$3$H(B$B8@$&$J!W(B
From: eamer (eamer_at_digitalme.com)
Date: 10/12/04
- Next message: Raan: "Re: Have a Café Haiku"
- Previous message: eamer: "Re: $B!VE,Ev$J$3$H8@$&$J!W(B"
- In reply to: Paul Blay: "Re: EDICT yabai (Was Re: $B!VE,Ev(B$B$J$3$H8@$&$J!W(B"
- Next in thread: Paul Blay: "Re: EDICT yabai (Was Re: $B!VE,Ev(B$B$J$3$H8@$&$J!W(B"
- Reply: Paul Blay: "Re: EDICT yabai (Was Re: $B!VE,Ev(B$B$J$3$H8@$&$J!W(B"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 00:38:49 +0900
Paul Blay wrote:
> "Paul Blay" wrote ...
>
>> "$B#S#r#i#n!&#T#u#a#r(B" wrote ...
>
>
> Coming to think of it ... Hey! Look who can post in JIS when he wants
> to ;-)
>
>>> Would you be interested in adding the antonym of $BE,Ev(B
>>> to its gloss?
>
>
> But that wasn't why I'm posting this.
>
> If we take ...
>
> $BE,Ev(B $B!Z$F$-$H$&![(B (adj-na,n) (1) fitness; suitability; adequacy;
> relevance; (2) bodge-job; rough fix; half-arsed; (P)
> Then I think
> $BE,Ev$KF~$C$F>!<j$K$d$C$F!#(B Come on in and make yourself at home.
> (Sense 2)
>
> is the only (Sense 2) one of the current examples. Unfortunately the
> gloss isn't quite right for that ...
>
<snip>
> $B%"%s%1!<%HMQ;f$,E,Ev$KG[$i$l$?!#(B The questionnaire form was distributed
> properly. (Sense 1)
For some reason I think sense 2 is much more likely.
- Next message: Raan: "Re: Have a Café Haiku"
- Previous message: eamer: "Re: $B!VE,Ev$J$3$H8@$&$J!W(B"
- In reply to: Paul Blay: "Re: EDICT yabai (Was Re: $B!VE,Ev(B$B$J$3$H8@$&$J!W(B"
- Next in thread: Paul Blay: "Re: EDICT yabai (Was Re: $B!VE,Ev(B$B$J$3$H8@$&$J!W(B"
- Reply: Paul Blay: "Re: EDICT yabai (Was Re: $B!VE,Ev(B$B$J$3$H8@$&$J!W(B"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|