Re: What's the difference between searching and searching?

jim_breen_at_hotmail.com
Date: 01/26/05


Date: 26 Jan 2005 21:25:50 GMT

Paul Blay <ranma@saotome.demon.co.uk> dixit:
>I forgot one trick. Windows IME's little pop-up info often
>give useful information on which to choose. Unfortunately
>you can't copy 'n' paste it so I'll have to look 'n' type
>instead. (Which is a pain because it disappears from the
>screen as soon as I start to type.)

>$BC5$9!JM_$7$$$b$N$r!K!V<Z2H$rC5$9!"?&$rC5$9!"JuC5$7!W(B
>$BA\$9!J8+$($J$/$J$C$?$b$N$r!K!VLB;R$rA\$9!"HH?M$rA\$9!"?H85A\$7!W(B

>Now how much salt you want to take with the above it up to you.

With about as much salt as I take Whirred's reported spelling
errors when I select "en-au", and then use "ize" endings.
According the Deep Thinkers Of Seattle, Australians must use
"ise".

>One entry which I think deserves more differentiation is
>$B;W$&(B(P); $BA[$&(B $B!Z$*$b$&![(B (v5u) to think; to feel
>I think most reading here will know the difference between those
>two.

Interesting. I'm clearly not in the "most reading here" cohort.
Neither $B9-<-1q(B nor $BBg<-NS(B differentiates. The $B9-<-1q(B entry begins:

$B$*$b!&$&!Z;W$&!&A[$&!&21$&!&G0$&![%*%b%U(B

Now there's a smorgasbord indeed. $BBg<-NS(B is a bit constrained, with:

$B$*$b!&$&(B $B%*%b%U(B [2] $B!Z;W$&!&A[$&![(B $B!JF0%o8^!N%O;M!O!K(B

Neither offers any differentiation in the explanation of the verb.

Kenkyusha GG5 solves it neatly by omitting $BA[$&(B entirely.

Can you offer examples of the differentiation?

-- 
Jim Breen        http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/
Computer Science & Software Engineering,
Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia 
$B%8%`!&%V%j!<%s(B@$B%b%J%7%eBg3X(B


Relevant Pages

  • Long division
    ... I was reading a math book which had a proof of differentiation of a ... quotient usually written as u/v that I hadn't seen before. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Long division
    ... I was reading a math book which had a proof of differentiation of a ... quotient usually written as u/v that I hadn't seen before. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: continuity and differentiability
    ... I'm reading on my own Lay's 'Analysis with Introduction to Proof', ... going through the section on differentiation, ... be wanting to draw the same conclusion. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: continuity and differentiability
    ... > I'm reading on my own Lay's 'Analysis with Introduction to Proof', ... > going through the section on differentiation, ... > Yet I'm unhappy with this result, ... > being continious at x = c as the precondition for the limit to exist ...
    (sci.math)

Quantcast