Re: Most used codification for emails.
From: Nacho (ncc1701zzz_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/10/05
- Next message: Sean: "Re: Photos of Japan"
- Previous message: Paul Blay: "Re: Why don't guide dogs learn Japanese?"
- In reply to: Joshua A. Reyer: "Re: Most used codification for emails."
- Next in thread: Paul Blay: "Re: Most used codification for emails."
- Reply: Paul Blay: "Re: Most used codification for emails."
- Reply: jim_breen_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Most used codification for emails."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:54:15 +0100
Joshua A. Reyer wrote:
> Paul Blay wrote:
>
>> I'd probably stick with JIS (ISO-2022-JP) because most people
>> will be expecting that - it's the only one Outlook Express can
>> _compose_ in.
>
>
> It's the only one Mozilla will let you compose in as well. Well, you
> can compose Japanese in some other encoding, like Unicode, but then
> Mozilla will get mad at you and tell your mail may not be readable.
>
Mmm, not at all.
In fact, with my default encoding (Western 8859-1), it suggest UTF-8
when sending.
Also I think that UTF-8 is the only coding that allows me mix Japanese
and Spanish characters.
Well, I'll try to use ISO-2022-JP and I'll see if all my friends can
read it.
Best regards.
- Next message: Sean: "Re: Photos of Japan"
- Previous message: Paul Blay: "Re: Why don't guide dogs learn Japanese?"
- In reply to: Joshua A. Reyer: "Re: Most used codification for emails."
- Next in thread: Paul Blay: "Re: Most used codification for emails."
- Reply: Paul Blay: "Re: Most used codification for emails."
- Reply: jim_breen_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Most used codification for emails."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|