Re: Eijiro: quirky or wrong?
From: Kevin Gowen (kgowenNOSPAM_at_myfastmail.com)
Date: 02/27/05
- Next message: Bart Mathias: "Re: Problem wih characters (was Problem with IME)"
- Previous message: Bart Mathias: "Re: Eijiro: quirky or wrong?"
- In reply to: necoandjeff: "Re: Eijiro: quirky or wrong?"
- Next in thread: jim_breen_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Eijiro: quirky or wrong?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:51:40 -0500
necoandjeff wrote:
> Kevin Gowen wrote:
>
>>necoandjeff wrote:
>>
>>>Kevin Gowen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>jim_breen@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Kevin Gowen <kgowenNOSPAM@myfastmail.com> dixit:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>I just checked EDICT. $B$F$3$-(B is missing. It means "hand job".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Hmm. Yes. Usually $B<j%3%-(B according to Google.
>>>>>
>>>>>Etymology anyone? Is the $B%3%-(B from $B8F5$(B?
>>>>
>>>>As others have said, from $B07$/(B. You may also be familiar with the
>>>>related expression $B0lH/$rH4$/!#(B
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>FAB = -FBA
>>>>It's not just a good idea; it's the law.
>>>
>>>
>>>Okay, I'll bite, what the hell does your sig mean?
>>
>>It's Newton's Third Law of Motion. If a body A exerts a force FAB on a
>>body B, then B exerts a force FBA on A
>
>
> I'll bet it is equal and opposite too.
You would be correct, sir, as is conveyed by the formula. For example,
when a book weighing one pound is at rest on a table, the table is
pushing up on the book with one pound of force.
- Kevin
-- FAB = -FBA It's not just a good idea; it's the law.
- Next message: Bart Mathias: "Re: Problem wih characters (was Problem with IME)"
- Previous message: Bart Mathias: "Re: Eijiro: quirky or wrong?"
- In reply to: necoandjeff: "Re: Eijiro: quirky or wrong?"
- Next in thread: jim_breen_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Eijiro: quirky or wrong?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
