Re: Three "Genki"-questions
From: muchan (usenet_at_usenet.usenet)
Date: 03/29/05
- Next message: B. Ito: "Re: ...koiten janee"
- Previous message: muchan: "Re: Even in those days, there was love"
- In reply to: Bart Mathias: "Re: Three "Genki"-questions"
- Next in thread: Bart Mathias: "Re: Three "Genki"-questions"
- Reply: Bart Mathias: "Re: Three "Genki"-questions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:04:44 +0200
Bart Mathias wrote:
>>>[...]
>>>2. $BH?BP$9$k(B
>>>This one is translated as "to oppose; to object to ($B!A$K(B)".
>>>What i am unsure of is whether the particle belongs to
>>>both translations or only the last one. I can see how "to
>>>oppose" can be used as a transitive verb as well as an
>>>intransitive one.
>>
>>
>>Hmm, $B!{!{$rH?BP$9$k(B is far from non-existent but I think the
>>standard (and much more common) particle is $B$K(B for both.
>
>
> I thought I used to know a nuance twixt them, but having these both used
> in the same document, I sure can't see it, unless the first is more "be
> against" and the second more "to (actively?) oppose."
>
> $B@oAh$KH?BP$7!"(B...
>
> $B@oAh;Y1g$rH?BP$9$k(B
>
> Bart
Hmmmm, I would oppose helping the war, but I wouln't use $B$r(B.
muchan
- Next message: B. Ito: "Re: ...koiten janee"
- Previous message: muchan: "Re: Even in those days, there was love"
- In reply to: Bart Mathias: "Re: Three "Genki"-questions"
- Next in thread: Bart Mathias: "Re: Three "Genki"-questions"
- Reply: Bart Mathias: "Re: Three "Genki"-questions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|