Re: Three "Genki"-questions
From: Bart Mathias (mathias_at_hawaii.edu)
Date: 03/30/05
- Next message: Bart Mathias: "Re: $B!I$O$$$D!I(B"
- Previous message: Danny Wilde: "Re: Alveolar Trill"
- In reply to: muchan: "Re: Three "Genki"-questions"
- Next in thread: Konrad Den Ende: "Re: Three "Genki"-questions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:38:58 GMT
muchan wrote:
> Bart Mathias wrote:
> [Someone, probably Paul Blay, noted:]
>>>Hmm, $B!{!{$rH?BP$9$k(B is far from non-existent but I think the
>>>standard (and much more common) particle is $B$K(B for both.
>>I thought I used to know a nuance twixt them, but having these both used
>>in the same document, I sure can't see it, unless the first is more "be
>>against" and the second more "to (actively?) oppose."
>>
>>$B@oAh$KH?BP$7!"(B...
>>
>>$B@oAh;Y1g$rH?BP$9$k(B
> Hmmmm, I would oppose helping the war, but I wouln't use $B$r(B.
OK, I get that you're probably pacificly inclined, but am I correct in
taking it that you would say $B@oAh;Y1g$KH?BP$9$k(B instead of the above?
And can I take it a step further, and assume that you would prefer ...$B$K(B
$BH?BP$9$k(B in all cases? There are for sure a lot of $B$rH?BP$9$k(B in the
web sites that Google looks at.
I have a vague memory that there was a case of $B$rH?BP$9$k(B in the
textbook we used to use for third-year Japanese (something produced at
ICU, IIRC) that my NS colleagues accepted, and could explain.
I sure wish I could remember things. I can't even remember whether I
used to could or not.
Bart
- Next message: Bart Mathias: "Re: $B!I$O$$$D!I(B"
- Previous message: Danny Wilde: "Re: Alveolar Trill"
- In reply to: muchan: "Re: Three "Genki"-questions"
- Next in thread: Konrad Den Ende: "Re: Three "Genki"-questions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
