Re: more intransitive verb business (Jim Breen)

jwb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Curt Fischer <tentrillion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> dixit:
>
>>jwb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>>>Curt Fischer <tentrillion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> dixit:
>>>
>>>
>>>>This post is for people interested in discussing the accuracy of the
>>>>list at http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/ti_list.html . Perhaps
>>>>people like Jim Breen. Or others.
>>>
>>>Good to see someone reacting to that list.
>
>
>>I also noticed that 竦む and 竦める would be good candidates for
>>inclusion.
>
>
> I'll add them.
>
>
>>Thankfully, there appears to be no such word as 竦まる.
>
>
> 広辞苑:
>
> すく‐ま・る【竦まる】
> 【自四】
> 身がちぢまる。すくむ。宇津保物語国譲上「立ち帰り―・
> りてこそ」

Hmm. I just bought a brand new Seiko K6000 and was convinced that I had
checked its built-in 広辞苑 for 竦まる. It turns out that I had checked
one of the other, inferior 国語辞典's built into the thing. Oops.

Anyway, how do people feel about the を-ability of 逃げる. That would
create another dual transitive pair, 逃げる and 逃がす, which is already
on the list.

Lots of Google hits for を逃げる again, although I suspect many people
might object to this usage.

--
Curt Fischer

.

Relevant Pages