Re: Question: Radicals of ??????in edict
- From: jwb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 04:37:42 GMT
Curt Fischer <tentrillion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> dixit:
>Also, you can remove the question marks from your entries dya? dyu? dyo?
>under the waapuro romaji column. They are correct insofar as the
>Microsoft IME is the standard for waapuro romaji.
Correct also for kinput2/canna.
>[You could start
>adding things like dixa dixu dixo and dila dilu dilo was well, but that
>would start getting a bit weird.]
I notice that for しゃ, しゅ & しょ you say the Hepburn is "sya",
"syu", etc. AFAIK the Hepburn for these is actually "sha", "shu", etc.
These work in ワープロ・ローマ字 too.
--
Jim Breen http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/
Clayton School of Information Technology,
Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia
ジム・ブリーン@モナシュ大学
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question: Radicals of ??????in edict
- From: Dan Rempel
- Waapuro romanisation
- From: Ben Finney
- Re: Question: Radicals of ??????in edict
- References:
- Question: Radicals of 共 in edict
- From: Soren Svendsen
- Re: Question: Radicals of 共 in edict
- From: Søren Svendsen
- Re: Question: Radicals of 共 in edict
- From: Travers Naran
- Re: Question: Radicals of 共 in edict
- From: Bart Mathias
- Re: Question: Radicals of 共 in edict
- From: Travers Naran
- Re: Question: Radicals of 共 in edict
- From: Bart Mathias
- Re: Question: Radicals of 共 in edict
- From: Travers Naran
- Re: Question: Radicals of 共 in edict
- From: Ben Bullock
- Re: Question: Radicals of 共 in edict
- From: necoandjeff
- Re: Question: Radicals of 共 in edict
- From: Curt Fischer
- Re: Question: Radicals of 共 in edict
- From: Ben Bullock
- Re: Question: Radicals of 共 in edict
- From: Curt Fischer
- Question: Radicals of 共 in edict
- Prev by Date: Re: kanjidic parser in Perl?
- Next by Date: Re: kanjidic parser in Perl?
- Previous by thread: Re: Question: Radicals of 共 in edict
- Next by thread: Waapuro romanisation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading