Re: いそいでます
- From: Sean <seanpantsholland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:10:51 GMT
Dan Rempel wrote:
> Felt I should offer a less flip response than my previous one (I was
> feeling a bit off after making a fool of myself in public): thanks
> Anthony. A contraction does make more sense than simple elision,
> especially since -て’る seems to occur so frequently. And thanks to all
> for not jumping up and saying "Well, duh!" when the light finally went
> on for me: I was misled by what I (thought I) heard into thinking I'd
> run into something completely new for me, rather than the obvious
> progressive form.
>
> Dan
Well, duh!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: いそいでます
- From: Dan Rempel
- Re: いそいでます
- From: Dan Rempel
- Re: いそいでます
- References:
- いそいでます
- From: Dan Rempel
- Re: いそいでます
- From: Paul Blay
- Re: いそいでます
- From: Dan Rempel
- Re: いそいでます
- From: Paul Blay
- Re: いそいでます
- From: Dan Rempel
- Re: いそいでます
- From: Anthony Bryant
- Re: いそいでます
- From: Dan Rempel
- いそいでます
- Prev by Date: [link] furichin wa yabai
- Next by Date: Re: EDICT : nokemono (merge); nokemono ni suru
- Previous by thread: Re: いそいでます
- Next by thread: Re: いそいでます
- Index(es):