Re: uh?
- From: Bart Mathias <mathias@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 00:50:34 GMT
The Wanderer wrote:
Marc Adler wrote:
Paul Blay wrote:
I mean transcribing.
So you want to transcribe "uh?". That would be あ?
No, it wouldn't - not quite; close, but not identical.
> > I've been forced to conclude, after givning the issue a fair amount of > thought some time back, that Japanese does not contain any way to > represent several different sounds which in English are alternate > pronunciations of the vowels. Specificaly, I've been unable to find a > way to represent "a" as in "fast", "e" as in "pet", "i" as in "fist", > and "u" as in "duh" (which last is, unless I'm much mistaken, the > sound at hand) [...]
But the sound of "duh" does fall into the total (allophonic and free-variation) range of the vowel of the あ列 (which includes, not surprisingly, あ). My impression is that it is most likely to occur before a long consonant, quasi-allophonically, but as I reported earlier, my first encounter with it was from a Japanese person naming the kana ザ for me.
The fronting of や, or particularly, きゃ and ぎゃ, ends up with a vowel approaching that of the "a" in cat, probably at least as fronted as the "a" in French "quatre." And one of the characteristics of what I call チンピラ語 is a general fronting of that vowel.
But of course you are right that there is no way to deliberately distinguish the many sounds of Japanese vowels in kana.
Bart .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: uh?
- From: The Wanderer
- Re: uh?
- References:
- Re: uh?
- From: Marc Adler
- Re: uh?
- Prev by Date: Re: common names for trees
- Next by Date: Re: Is the yomi here correctly connected?
- Previous by thread: Re: uh?
- Next by thread: Re: uh?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|