Re: Why is Canon spelled kya-no-n?
- From: "Dave Fossett" <reply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:09:10 +0900
Zhen Lin wrote:
It's written キヤノン, not キャノン. However... it might be pronounced キャノン -- sutegana, or small kana, were not used in pre-reform orthography.
I was told by a Canon employee that the reason for writing it as キヤノン was because it looked more "aesthetically pleasing" without the awkward amount of white space between the "ャ" and the "ノ".
--
Dave Fossett
Saitama, Japan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why is Canon spelled kya-no-n?
- From: rose
- Re: Why is Canon spelled kya-no-n?
- References:
- Re: Why is Canon spelled kya-no-n?
- From: Zhen Lin
- Re: Why is Canon spelled kya-no-n?
- Prev by Date: Re: Jim Breen - I'm frustrated with WWWJDIC
- Next by Date: Re: Jim Breen - I'm frustrated with WWWJDIC
- Previous by thread: Re: Why is Canon spelled kya-no-n?
- Next by thread: Re: Why is Canon spelled kya-no-n?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading