Re: Neutral meaning of the particle "O"
- From: muchan <muchan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:02:15 +0100
mirror wrote:
These seem to be verbs that do not need noun complements (also
called objects). Thus the GA.
I need to see how this fits with or undermines my notion.
But transitive verbs also has GA, if they have subject...
in other words,
Whether a verb has object or not doesn't affect whether the verb
has a subject or not,
in other words,
"Have-O-ness" doesn't affect "have-GA-ness" of verb.
Thus your term using GA/O for notion of vi. vt. is questionable, IMO.
muchan
.
- References:
- Re: Neutral meaning of the particle "O"
- From: muchan
- Re: Neutral meaning of the particle "O"
- From: muchan
- Re: Neutral meaning of the particle "O"
- From: muchan
- Re: Neutral meaning of the particle "O"
- From: muchan
- Re: Neutral meaning of the particle "O"
- Prev by Date: Re: question about ?
- Next by Date: Re: question about ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Neutral meaning of the particle "O"
- Next by thread: Re: Neutral meaning of the particle "O"
- Index(es):