Re: More Wikipedia fun
- From: Chris Kern <chriskern99@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:06:09 -0500
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 23:14:28 +0900, "Ben Bullock"
<benkasminbullock@xxxxxxxxx> posted the following:
I know the people editing Japanese
history articles get really fed up because articles about historical figures
end up with huge lists of appearances of the historical figure in
manga/anime attached,
I don't personally see the problem with this -- there's no limit on
the length of an article, so it's not like if people add the
"appearances in popular culture" section that it prevents other
information from being put in there. It's not the same thing as
inaccurate information.
In fact, can you provide any good reason why a "appearances in popular
culture" section does not belong in an article about a historical
figure?
-Chris
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
.
- References:
- More Wikipedia fun
- From: Ben Bullock
- Re: More Wikipedia fun
- From: muchan
- Re: More Wikipedia fun
- From: Chris Kern
- Re: More Wikipedia fun
- From: Ben Bullock
- More Wikipedia fun
- Prev by Date: Re: JLPT 1: Is it necessary to be able to actually write kanji?
- Previous by thread: Re: More Wikipedia fun
- Next by thread: Re: More Wikipedia fun
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
