Re: question about neba/nakereba
- From: "B. Ito" <jg2cme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:08:10 +0900
"Paul Blay" <ask_me_or_get_spam_trapped@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:e3urqd$g23$1$830fa79d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<jwb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote ...Paul Blay <ask_me_or_get_spam_trapped@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> dixit:On the ねば without ならない subject I found these two.
もうほんのちょっと気をつけねば。
You should be a thought more careful.
君に行ってもらわねば承知しない。
I'm adamant that you should go.
Both of these seem to be cases of omitted ならないs.
Certainly the first is but I don't see how the second can
be viewed that way.
ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー
Ok. May I consider the matter as follows?
もうほんのちょっと気をつけねば。
It's very clear that one of the following phrases is abbreviated.
（、、、、、ねば (.ねばならない、なりません、だめよ、承知しないよ、等））
君に行ってもらわねば（ならないので、君が行かないなんて（そんな事は））承知しない。
To make the sentence have a sense, you have to put so many
words and phrases. Therefore this is not a matter of abbreviation.
ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー
Ｂ．Ｉｔｏ
.
- References:
- question about neba/nakereba
- From: jwb
- Re: question about neba/nakereba
- From: Paul Blay
- Re: question about neba/nakereba
- From: jwb
- Re: question about neba/nakereba
- From: Paul Blay
- question about neba/nakereba
- Prev by Date: Re: question about neba/nakereba
- Next by Date: 以下の通り
- Previous by thread: Re: question about neba/nakereba
- Next by thread: Re: question about neba/nakereba
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
