Re: Language/culture question; $BIOK3$f$9$j (B


<jwb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:2Thdg.10552$S7.1993@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Collin McCulley <collin372@xxxxxxxxx> dixit:
Well, I haven't been posting here since unicode became so common
instead of JIS. It appears outlook can't properly take a unicode
message and reply to it in JIS without munging the Japanese text.
I guess I'm left with the choice of new newsreader or post in unicode...

Anyway partially corrected version (hopefully) below.

Well, your post had no MIME header for coding at all.

Maybe this will be better. I've mucked with the settings and tried
a couple of test posts in alt.test which seem to work.

これ見えるかな。 Of course the acid test will be the next time I
reply to something originally unicode.

And your Japanese was in JIS/ISO-2022-JP

I have nkf installed, so if I so desire I can pass UTF8-coded posts
through it and see them properly.

Well, if this doesn't work I'll just switch the whole thing over to unicode
and hope for the best. Tried to configure Forte Agent to display Japanese
properly and had no luck.

--Collin



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Language/culture question; $BIOK3$f$9$j (B
    ... It appears outlook can't properly take a unicode ... message and reply to it in JIS without munging the Japanese text. ... And your Japanese was in JIS/ISO-2022-JP ...
    (sci.lang.japan)
  • Re: KANJD212
    ... >Who decides the factors and what are their criteria, Unicode? ... character is coded more than once in a national standard, ... I can use a code like JIS X0208 along with a font ...
    (sci.lang.japan)
  • Re: KANJD212
    ... >>Who decides the factors and what are their criteria, Unicode? ... But once a character is defined/get a codepoint in Unicode it ... standard modifies the codepoint of the kanji to a totally new ... I can use a code like JIS X0208 along with a font ...
    (sci.lang.japan)
  • Re: KANJD212
    ... The 1983 version of JIS208 meddled with glyphs ... Who decides the factors and what are their criteria, Unicode? ... >>there had not already been an existing JIS X 0208. ... > standard was published. ...
    (sci.lang.japan)
  • Re: KANJD212
    ... the old set of glyphs were allowed ... If it's one like Unicode, then I don't agree at all. ... > support for JIS X 9051-1984 which had tried to define glyphs. ... I should have picked up a kanji thrown into ...
    (sci.lang.japan)
Quantcast