Re: Odd use of kau
- From: Jim Breen <jwb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:29:10 GMT
Paul Blay wrote:
All right then, move along now. :)
http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/dicsubs/today.html
Actually I beat you to it by several minutes.
Incidentally I'm a little disappointed at the number of people contributing
Edict entries. I'm sure there must be more than four people who regularly
Edict, often come across words/meanings not in there and have the
ability to put together a submission.
I think a reasonable aim* would be to have about twice as many entries in
Edict as there are now (which would bring it close to the range of 国語
dictionaries like 大辞林 and 広辞苑). At the current rate that's going to
take about a decade.
OTOH, while there is just one editor (me) I don't really want a lot
more new entries right now. We are getting close to having an online
editing system with multiple editors, and you can start flooding them in
then.
--
Jim Breen http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/
Clayton School of Information Technology,
Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia
ジム・ブリーン@モナシュ大学
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Odd use of kau
- From: Paul Blay
- Re: Odd use of kau
- References:
- Odd use of kau
- From: Paul D
- Re: Odd use of kau
- From: muchan
- Re: Odd use of kau
- From: Paul D
- Re: Odd use of kau
- From: Paul Blay
- Odd use of kau
- Prev by Date: Re: Odd use of kau
- Next by Date: Re: Odd use of kau
- Previous by thread: Re: Odd use of kau
- Next by thread: Re: Odd use of kau
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|