Re: Literacy
- From: Phil Yff <phil.yff@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 16:06:04 -0400
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 05:28:36 GMT, Jim Breen wrote:
Should I believe Wikipedia since it claims that Japanese and Americans
are equally literate?:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_literacy_rate
If you believe the UN report they quote; yes.
However, since that report justs states the results without
mentioning their sources or methodology, you have a right (and
duty) to be skeptical. How anyone can claim an accuracy of 0.1%
in literacy measurements in languages with widely differing
script difficulties is beyond me. And one suspects, at least in
the case of Japan, that results are based on self-declarations
by governments.
Exactly. The Wikipedia article cited in the original post was an article
reporting on the UN study. I believe it's report on the study was
accurate. The Wikipedia article on literacy can be found at the below URL.
Among other things, it discusses the compexity of assessing literacy:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literacy
Phil Yff
.
- References:
- Literacy
- From: aesthete8@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Literacy
- From: Jim Breen
- Literacy
- Prev by Date: Re: Literacy
- Next by Date: Re: Literacy
- Previous by thread: Re: Literacy
- Next by thread: Re: Literacy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|