Re: Statistical Comparison of Languages.
From: Peter T. Daniels (grammatim_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 06/09/04
- Next message: Marco Cimarosti: "Re: Why are primitive (read, archaic) languages so un-primitive?"
- Previous message: Matthew Huntbach: "Re: "I'm coffee and he's espresso." -- facially nonsensical"
- In reply to: JMB: "Re: Statistical Comparison of Languages."
- Next in thread: JMB: "Re: Statistical Comparison of Languages."
- Reply: JMB: "Re: Statistical Comparison of Languages."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 13:40:06 GMT
JMB wrote:
>
> "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:40C70BD8.5B5E@worldnet.att.net...
> > It was well past the discussion of "vowelless Ogham" before it appeared
> > at sci.lang; no portion of the "vowelless Ogham" discussion appeared at
> > sci.lang; I repeat, you have a peculiar notion of "involvement"; and
> > what is "prat"?
>
> A prat is someone who behaves much the way you are. Luckily enough, I now
> realise that you are not actually the person I thought you were at the
> start. I realised that when you didn't know what "acting the bollox" meant.
> Thankfully, I can still consider him to be a pleasant person to deal with.
> I'm not sure why I got him confused with you, I should have known something
> wasn't right from the difference in attitudes.
And you think _that_ is comprehensible?? Who the hell did you think I
am? Is there someone posting to sci.arch under the name "Peter T.
Daniels"?
-- Peter T. Daniels grammatim@att.net
- Next message: Marco Cimarosti: "Re: Why are primitive (read, archaic) languages so un-primitive?"
- Previous message: Matthew Huntbach: "Re: "I'm coffee and he's espresso." -- facially nonsensical"
- In reply to: JMB: "Re: Statistical Comparison of Languages."
- Next in thread: JMB: "Re: Statistical Comparison of Languages."
- Reply: JMB: "Re: Statistical Comparison of Languages."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]