Re: Learning a language
From: ORIELO (uiesperanto_at_aol.com)
Date: 06/22/04
- Next message: ORIELO: "Re: Learning a language"
- Previous message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: On case: (was Re: Learning a language)"
- In reply to: LEE Sau Dan: "Re: Learning a language"
- Next in thread: Richard Herring: "Re: Learning a language"
- Reply: Richard Herring: "Re: Learning a language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 22 Jun 2004 14:03:53 GMT
>ORIELO> But E-o does not have lexical tones,
>
>Neither does Malay-Indonesian.
I didn't have MI in mind with tone.
>Yeah, Vietnamese, Chinese, Thai have tones. So what? Esperanto has
>those difficult consonant clusters, such as "kv", "sc", etc. They
>aren't easier than tones.
But, "kv" "sc" and the alleged others don't have the potential of changing the
meaning of EVERY WORD in the language, now, do they?
>I can't remember but I think Malay-Indonesian has tones.
>
You just said above that it didn't!!
>What are those? Are you going to say that all the ambiguities
>possible in Esperanto a "necessary"? Examples?
for example the 'optionally expressed" subject in Japanese verbs.
>ORIELO> and probably a number of other horrors that I'm not
> ORIELO> familiar with.
>
>Esperanto doesn't lack them.
Maybe, maybe not.........but at least our horrors are simpler to deal with
Orienta Iowa Esperanto-Ligo
- Next message: ORIELO: "Re: Learning a language"
- Previous message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: On case: (was Re: Learning a language)"
- In reply to: LEE Sau Dan: "Re: Learning a language"
- Next in thread: Richard Herring: "Re: Learning a language"
- Reply: Richard Herring: "Re: Learning a language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|