Re: Learning a language
From: Richard Herring (junk_at_[127.0.0.1)
Date: 06/24/04
- Next message: Rex F. May: "Re: Esperantist lies (Re: Learning a language)"
- Previous message: Rex F. May: "Re: Learning a language"
- In reply to: Dmitri: "Re: Learning a language"
- Next in thread: Dmitri: "Re: Learning a language"
- Reply: Dmitri: "Re: Learning a language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 15:13:42 +0100
In message <20040624090115.11526.00000365@mb-m23.aol.com>, Dmitri
<uiesperanto@aol.com> writes
>>From: Richard Herring
>
>>OK, I'll concede: not all five tones on all words. But how about 2 tones or
>>>even 3 or 4?
>>
>>Some words, certainly. Nothing like all of them.
>
>WEll, then why even bother having the damned things
Wrong question. I'm describing the features of an existing language that
makes these distinctions, not trying to design one.
>if they're just "window
>dressing"??
They're not. They are one of several phonological dimensions that can
distinguish syllables. You might as well ask why even bother having a
distinction between aspirated and unaspirated stops, or long and short
vowels, or...
>I mean i4 has how many meanings??
"i4"? In Thai, none.
>.......can a few more added on because of
>dropping the tones make that much of a difference?
It all depends. I can imagine circumstances where confusing a tiger with
a shirt would be unwise.
-- Richard Herring
- Next message: Rex F. May: "Re: Esperantist lies (Re: Learning a language)"
- Previous message: Rex F. May: "Re: Learning a language"
- In reply to: Dmitri: "Re: Learning a language"
- Next in thread: Dmitri: "Re: Learning a language"
- Reply: Dmitri: "Re: Learning a language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|