Re: The Phaistos Disk, side A, according to Fischer

From: grapheus (grapheus_at_www.com)
Date: 07/07/04 

Date: 7 Jul 2004 02:00:23 -0700

Jacques Guy <jguy@alphalink.com.au> wrote in message news:<40EBC5D2.642F@alphalink.com.au>...
> Peter T. Daniels wrote:
>
> > grapheus wrote:
>
> > > It's not "better". CONTRARILY to Fisher's solution, J.F.'s Solution
> > > HAS BEEN *PROVED* !!!!
> > > But, of course, you voluntarily DID NOT QUOTE Chapters 6 and 7 of
> > > J.F.'s book,
>
> Faut pas pousser grand-père dans les orties... if I didn't quote
> chapters
> 6 and 7, it's because they extend from page 127 to page 175, and the
> book
> is 192 pages long, et j'ai pas envie de me retrouver avec un procès au
> cul avec l'Harmattan gueulant "copyright! copyright!"
>

That is an AVOWAL !...
You don't fear getting a suit from L'Harmattan for publishing (without
autorization, I suppose ?) the whole decipherment, but you get afraid
publishing the PROOFS supporting it !...

PROOFS, as I said,
> > > which are THE MOST IMPORTANT, a lot more than the
> > > translation of the text or the method J.F. used!...

Of course, WRITING that the "Proto-Ionic Solution" is THE ONLY ONE to
EXPLAIN in a VERY SATISFACTORY WAY *all* the EPIGRAPHICAL FACTS, like
: "Why are the signs crowded in A29 and not in the adjacents
compartments ?" , or DISCUSSING matters like : "What is the
probability that a false deciphering-attempt can lead to acrophony ?"
-- "Why 3 leading astronomers have involuntarily demonstrated that the
"Inventors of the Constellations" were the Proto-Ionians ?.. What to
think about the Ovenden's theory ?" -- etc. ARE TO PUT ASIDE !...
ONLY COMPARING the *PROVED* J.F.'s decipherment with OBVIOUS
STUPIDITIES like the Crombette's one IS, in YOUR eyes, ESSENTIAL !!!!
Think a bit about it : What IF the discussion of the CENSORED SUBJECTS
 was leading to the conclusion that, YES, the Proto-Ionic Solution
*IS* the GOOD ONE ?... HOW SHOCKING !.. Better keep silent about
such matters !...

By the way : NOBODY in this group has commented one of the
EPIGRAPHICAL PROOFS I gave, am I wrong?...

grapheus

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Generic thanks
    ... >> Phaistos Disk's decipherment was done, because they appeared, then, as ... This is nonsense, because the existence of ... "Proto-Ionic solution" *IS* the CORRECT one!... ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: The Phaistos Disk, side A, according to Fischer
    ... Faut pas pousser grand-père dans les orties... ... et j'ai pas envie de me retrouver avec un procès au ... an owl, a pitcher, and he sees there corroborations of his decipherment. ... signifiant with the signifié, ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Phaistos Disk decipherment
    ... >> decipherment if one starts from the correct hypotheses. ... >> unique solution. ... showing that the "Proto-Ionic Solution" is THE CORRECT ONE ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Anyone aware of a printed document on papyrus?
    ... of plausibility) have been advanced. ... but the Phaistos Disk has been deciphered. ... thing is that THIS decipherment is supported by more than 30 "proofs", ... a paper against the "Proto-Ionic Solution" has prefered NOT to examine ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: The Phaistos Disk, side A, according to Fischer
    ... > Does anyone have, somewhere, John Chadwick's decipherment, ... the BIG DIFFRENCE between the "Proto-Ionic Solution" and ALL ...
    (sci.lang)