Re: The Phaistos Disk, side A, according to Faucounau (was: Fischer)
From: grapheus (grapheus_at_www.com)
Date: 07/14/04
- Next message: Helmut Richter: "Re: Esperantist lies (Re: Learning a language)"
- Previous message: Wiktor S.: "Re: Esperantist lies (Re: Learning a language)"
- In reply to: Qakare: "Re: The Phaistos Disk, side A, according to Faucounau (was: Fischer)"
- Next in thread: Qakare: "Re: The Phaistos Disk, side A, according to Faucounau (was: Fischer)"
- Reply: Qakare: "Re: The Phaistos Disk, side A, according to Faucounau (was: Fischer)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 14 Jul 2004 03:27:02 -0700
qakare@hotmail.com (Qakare) wrote in message news:<dad05270.0407131418.413006d@posting.google.com>...
> grapheus@www.com (grapheus) wrote in message news:<337ae51f.0407130304.13403605@posting.google.com>...
> > qakare@hotmail.com (Qakare) wrote in message news:<dad05270.0407120707.773e6ee6@posting.google.com>...
> > > grapheus@www.com (grapheus) wrote in message news:<337ae51f.0407120050.4c97327f@posting.google.com>...
> > > > qakare@hotmail.com (Qakare) wrote in message news:<dad05270.0407111640.3bf7b63@posting.google.com>...
> > > > > grapheus@www.com (grapheus) wrote in message news:<337ae51f.0407110922.193f84bd@posting.google.com>...
> > > > > > qakare@hotmail.com (Qakare) wrote in message news:<dad05270.0407110038.51dfa70f@posting.google.com>...
> > > > > > > grapheus@www.com (grapheus) wrote in message news:<337ae51f.0407100802.2f0284e4@posting.google.com>...
> > > > > > > > qakare@hotmail.com (Qakare) wrote in message news:<dad05270.0407100252.465b5d80@posting.google.com>...
> > > > > > > > > grapheus@www.com (grapheus) wrote in message news:<337ae51f.0407091507.22fb4761@posting.google.com>...
> > > > > > > > > If he found the number of signs to high, why then he used so much signs
> > > > > > > > > with complex values?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I have to repeat it : any SCRIPT is a COMPROMISE between PHONETIC
> > > > > > > > ACCURACY and SIMPLICITY!...
> > > > > > > > Writing KRO instead of KO-RO is PHONETIC ACCURACY... In French,
> > > > > > > > writing <e> ,<é> and <è> is PHONETIC ACCURACY... Etc. But writing
> > > > > > > > in Mycenaean KO-RO instead of KRO is SIMPLICITY ... In the Phaistos
> > > > > > > > Disk, having ONE SIGN to translate TA, DA and THA is SIMPLICITY..
> > > > > > > > Etc.
> > > > > > > > Don't always ask "WHY" : Because THINGS are NOT ALWAYS LOGICAL !...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In the case of Faucounaus decipherment you are right. It is not
> > > > > > > logical and must therefore be rejected!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > IT is PERFECTLY LOGICAL... What is NOT is the WAY people DO TRANSLATE
> > > > > > SOUNDS into a SCRIPT. And this is a GENERAL PHENOMENON... Why, for
> > > > > > instance English uses different ways to write a "/i/ long" ?... Do
> > > > > > you have a LOGICAL explanation ?...
> > > > >
> > > > > It's not logical. For instance that /s/ and /r/ occur at the same time
> > > > > with complex values doesn't make sense.
> > > >
> > > > Following *YOUR* opinion !!!
> > > >
> > > > > Faucounau read sign 03 as
> > > > > /sto/. But such a sign is not needed any more in that script. You have
> > > > > the <s>! Therfore you should write /s-to/ easily as 12-33!
> > > >
> > > > You forgot that 12-33 would be read AS-TO, not STO , like 13-1 is read
> > > > AR-GO(S) !...
> > > > Your objection is, once more, far-fetched !..
> > >
> > > Very funny. Sometimes it's a /as/ sometimes a /s/, depending on what
> > > Faucounaus likes.
> >
> > NO! Following the CONTEXT !... At the BEGINNING of a word, it HAS to
> > be AS. At the end, it HAS to be -S. As SIMPLE AS THAT !..
> > But, of course, you IGNORE that in English, for instance, -EA- has not
> > the same PHONETIC VALUE in "deal" and in "a bear" !... Or that in the
> > XVIIe century French, the letter S was read sometimes /S/, other times
> > /F/ , etc...
> > WHAT A SCANDAL !... These examples show that your POSTULATE concerning
> > the Orthographic CONSISTENCY is DEADLY WRONG !.. Better IGNORING this
> > fact, as you IGNORE the *PROOFS* that the Proto-Ionic Solution IS the
> > ONLY CORRECT ONE, right ?....
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Moreover, it's ridiculous to start from the POSTULATE - never
> > > > respected by ANY script in the word!- that ORTHOGRAPHY is ALWAYS
> > > > "LOGICAL" , with the object of disparaging a decipherment PROVED by a
> > > > lot of EVIDENCE.
> > > >
> > >
> > > We don't talk about orthography! We are talking about the "grid" of
> > > Faucounaus syllables. This grid is a mix of all kinds of values the
> > > history of writing knows.
> >
> > AND HERE YOU GO AGAIN with your DISPARAGING but FALSE STATEMENTS !!!!
> > The said "mix of values" is, FOR the CONSONANTS, THE SAME AS IN THE
> > "CYPRIOT SYLLABIC SCRIPT" . As for the DOUBLE value of the S-sign, you
> > find the SAME PHENOMENON in the "Cypriot Syllabic Script" also. This
> > time, a sign has not the TWO values -S and AS- , but the TWO values :
> > -S and SE- .
>
> Foucaunaus AS- and AR- does not fit in his grid.
And WHY it does'n't FIT ?.. Because you SAID it ?...
Why a GREEK, inventing a script after having see the Egyptian
Hieroglyphs, who INVENTS an ACROPHONIC SCRIPT, but who NEEDS the
CONSONANTS -S and -R at the end of the words, would have NOT INVENTED
signs AS and AR for using them as -S and -R at the end of the words
?....
> Similiar to the
> cypriot syllabic script it has to read as -S and SA- and -R and RA-.
RIDICULOUS !... The Phaistos Disk's Script is NOT the Cypriot Script
!..
It's a NORMAL THING that in the Sypriot Script, a scribe, who had THE
SAME NEED as the Phaistos Disk's scribe to be able to render a final
-S or -R, DID USE the EXISTING SIGNS of the BORROWED SCRIPT !..
It's a different thing with the Phaistos Disk's Script WHICH HAS NOT
BEEN BORROWED, but invented!...
>
> Anyway that for instance sign 01 can be read as go, gu, ko, ku, kho
> and khu is unbelievable.
AND ONCE AGAIN, you are FORGETTING that the Phaistos Disk's Script HAS
BEEN INVENTED by a PROTO-IONIAN scribe !... ONLY in a Ionic Dialect
can O and U be almost the same phonemes.
This WELL-KNOWN PECULIARITY is even the thread which lead J.Faucounau
to the conclusion that the DIALECT "HAD" to be "IONIC". He has related
that he found, by Statistical considerations only, that the SCRIPT was
using the SAME sign for rendering O and U, but TWO different signs for
rendering etymological "short A" and "long A" . Therefore, he DEDUCED
that the LANGUAGE should be of a "IONIC TYPE" .....
grapheus
- Next message: Helmut Richter: "Re: Esperantist lies (Re: Learning a language)"
- Previous message: Wiktor S.: "Re: Esperantist lies (Re: Learning a language)"
- In reply to: Qakare: "Re: The Phaistos Disk, side A, according to Faucounau (was: Fischer)"
- Next in thread: Qakare: "Re: The Phaistos Disk, side A, according to Faucounau (was: Fischer)"
- Reply: Qakare: "Re: The Phaistos Disk, side A, according to Faucounau (was: Fischer)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|