Re: Long vs. short vowels in English
From: Des Small (des.small_at_bristol.ac.uk)
Date: 07/21/04
- Next message: kiril: "six in arabic"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: For those fond of French tongue peculiarities, ..."
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: Long vs. short vowels in English"
- Next in thread: Padraic Brown: "Re: Long vs. short vowels in English"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:12:47 GMT
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> writes:
> Torsten Poulin writes:
>
> > No it's not. It's a one-to-one correspondence between IPA symbols
> > and ASCII strings. As the man said.
>
> No, the man said "characters." And ASCII is a character-encoding
> protocol, not a string-encoding protocol.
I said, as you have of course snipped, "The one-to-one mapping in
question is, of course, between IPA and strings of one or more ASCII
characters."
Peter Daniels said, "ASCII IPA stands in one-to-one correspondence
with the characters of IPA and conversion between them is purely
mechanical."
You're a bare-faced liar.
Des
disapproves of that
-- "[T]he structural trend in linguistics which took root with the International Congresses of the twenties and early thirties [...] had close and effective connections with phenomenology in its Husserlian and Hegelian versions." -- Roman Jakobson
- Next message: kiril: "six in arabic"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: For those fond of French tongue peculiarities, ..."
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: Long vs. short vowels in English"
- Next in thread: Padraic Brown: "Re: Long vs. short vowels in English"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|