Re: have got
From: Brian M. Scott (b.scott_at_csuohio.edu)
Date: 07/24/04
- Next message: Tron Furu: "Re: Question on using "the" to represent whole."
- Previous message: o8TY: "Re: Linear A tablet Hagia Triada 95"
- In reply to: endipatterson: "re:have got"
- Next in thread: CB: "Re: re:have got"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 07:03:08 -0400
On 24 Jul 2004 05:27:45 -0500 endipatterson
<endipatterson@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid> wrote in
<news:410239a1$1_1@127.0.0.1> in sci.lang:
> It would seem that "got" and "gotten" still exist side by side in US
> English, Brian, although "got" has a very specific use.
What on earth is your point? Of course they do -- but not
as past participles of <to get>, as they once did.
[...]
Brian
- Next message: Tron Furu: "Re: Question on using "the" to represent whole."
- Previous message: o8TY: "Re: Linear A tablet Hagia Triada 95"
- In reply to: endipatterson: "re:have got"
- Next in thread: CB: "Re: re:have got"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]