Re: Mask Gang Slay
From: Peter T. Daniels (grammatim_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 07/27/04
- Next message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: viol."
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: New Scientist is at it again"
- In reply to: Harlan Messinger: "Mask Gang Slay"
- Next in thread: Harlan Messinger: "Re: Mask Gang Slay"
- Reply: Harlan Messinger: "Re: Mask Gang Slay"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:53:57 GMT
Harlan Messinger wrote:
>
> I couldn't help but think of Ron this weekend when I was up in New
> York and saw the Post headline "Mask Gang Slay". Stick that in your
> pipe and parse it.
I saw that in a vending box but would not, of course, venture 25c to
find out what it meant.
Especially since the day before they'd lied about Sandy Bergers socks.
(Or as they put it, "hose," making for an almost as impenetrable
headline.)
Nu, you were in NYC and didn't call??
-- Peter T. Daniels grammatim@att.net
- Next message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: viol."
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: New Scientist is at it again"
- In reply to: Harlan Messinger: "Mask Gang Slay"
- Next in thread: Harlan Messinger: "Re: Mask Gang Slay"
- Reply: Harlan Messinger: "Re: Mask Gang Slay"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|