Re: Best order to learn languages in?
From: LEE Sau Dan (danlee_at_informatik.uni-freiburg.de)
Date: 07/29/04
- Next message: o8TY: "Re: Linear A tablet Hagia Triada 95"
- Previous message: grapheus: "Re: ABCDE... why not KYNBR?"
- In reply to: Torsten Poulin: "Re: Best order to learn languages in?"
- Next in thread: Bill Bonde ( ``Soli Deo Gloria'' ): "Re: Best order to learn languages in?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 29 Jul 2004 16:55:22 +0200
>>>>> "Torsten" == Torsten Poulin <t_usenet_drop@hotmail.com> writes:
Torsten> LEE Sau Dan wrote:
>> How would a Chinese *monoglot* recognize those "international"
>> words?
Torsten> He would if said words happened to be borrowed into his
Torsten> form of Chinese.
But it happens to be NOT the case. The antecedent of your sentence
simply doesn't hold. So, the consequence doesn't follow.
Good that you're aware that you had to use the SUBJUNCTIVE mood in
that sentence.
Torsten> How do you think it works in other languages?
It didn't and doesn't work that way in Chinese.
--
Lee Sau Dan +Z05biGVm- ~{@nJX6X~}
E-mail: danlee@informatik.uni-freiburg.de
Home page: http://www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/~danlee
- Next message: o8TY: "Re: Linear A tablet Hagia Triada 95"
- Previous message: grapheus: "Re: ABCDE... why not KYNBR?"
- In reply to: Torsten Poulin: "Re: Best order to learn languages in?"
- Next in thread: Bill Bonde ( ``Soli Deo Gloria'' ): "Re: Best order to learn languages in?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]