Re: What's the different between /tS/ as one phoneme and as two?
From: Miguel Carrasquer (mcv_at_wxs.nl)
Date: 08/02/04
- Next message: Vanya: "Re: The most Latin of Romance languages?"
- Previous message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: What's the different between /tS/ as one phoneme and as two?"
- In reply to: Greg Lee: "Re: What's the different between /tS/ as one phoneme and as two?"
- Next in thread: Paul J Kriha: "Re: What's the different between /tS/ as one phoneme and as two?"
- Reply: Paul J Kriha: "Re: What's the different between /tS/ as one phoneme and as two?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 14:27:53 +0200
On 2 Aug 2004 11:43:08 GMT, Greg Lee
<greg@ling.lll.hawaii.edu> wrote:
>What counts is language evidence. You give
>some Polish examples which you say violate the rule. Maybe they
>do, and maybe they don't. Where are the syllables in your
>examples, and what is the evidence that tells us where they
>are?
That's easy in Polish. Syllabification is essential to
stress placement (the stress always falls on the penultimate
syllable, if there is one), so there can be no doubt about
the number of syllables in a Polish word (where enclitic
prepositions etc. do not count as separate words). <Pstrá,g>
and <rté,c'> are monosyllabic, e.g. <zá rte,c'> "for
mercury".
And you can hear it. There's a big difference between
bisyllabic Czech Petr and monosyllabic Polish Piotr.
=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@wxs.nl
- Next message: Vanya: "Re: The most Latin of Romance languages?"
- Previous message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: What's the different between /tS/ as one phoneme and as two?"
- In reply to: Greg Lee: "Re: What's the different between /tS/ as one phoneme and as two?"
- Next in thread: Paul J Kriha: "Re: What's the different between /tS/ as one phoneme and as two?"
- Reply: Paul J Kriha: "Re: What's the different between /tS/ as one phoneme and as two?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]