Re: Let's talk about langages (Advice/Help)
From: Mxsmanic (mxsmanic_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 08/20/04
- Next message: Brian M. Scott: "Re: dialects vs separate languages"
- Previous message: CB: "Re: Rules of Whom-Hypercorrection?"
- In reply to: DeMaisonneuve: "Re: Let's talk about langages (Advice/Help)"
- Next in thread: randee: "Re: Let's talk about langages (Advice/Help)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 05:11:02 +0200
DeMaisonneuve writes:
> In French, the simple past tense is very rarely used in spoken language. It
> is more widely used in writings. The meaning is quite similar to the one of
> the passe compose. There may be a very slight difference, but it is quite
> hard to explain.
It's not hard to explain at all. The passé simple is used for actions
that are completely contained in the past, with no connection to the
present. This is exactly the same usage that the past simple has in
English. The only difference is that, in modern French, there is a
tendency to use the passé composé (the equivalent of the present perfect
in English) for just about anything that isn't nearly historical. In
English, the past simple is still used much more liberally, for anything
that doesn't have an obvious connection to the present.
-- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
- Next message: Brian M. Scott: "Re: dialects vs separate languages"
- Previous message: CB: "Re: Rules of Whom-Hypercorrection?"
- In reply to: DeMaisonneuve: "Re: Let's talk about langages (Advice/Help)"
- Next in thread: randee: "Re: Let's talk about langages (Advice/Help)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|