Re: !!Re: More Phaistos Disk
From: Richard Herring (junk_at_[127.0.0.1)
Date: 08/20/04
- Next message: Jason K. Lambrou: "Re: dialects vs separate languages (was: The most Latin ofRomance languages?)"
- Previous message: Jacques Guy: "Re: Seen on aus.politics"
- In reply to: Jacques Guy: "!!Re: More Phaistos Disk"
- Next in thread: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: !!Re: More Phaistos Disk"
- Reply: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: !!Re: More Phaistos Disk"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 12:12:30 +0100
In message <4126C3A1.7A8A@alphalink.com.au>, Jacques Guy
<jguy@alphalink.com.au> writes
>Richard Herring wrote:
>
>[someone else]
>> >Qu'est-ce que ça veut dire, "phonetic language"?
>
>One that's pronounced phonetically. Unlike a
>phonemic language. As for written languages...
>
>> Do keep up at the back. Mr Banerjee has repeatedly told us that it's
>> what Vedic Sanskrit is and lesser languages are'n't.
>
>JF! JF! what are you doing here masquerading as Richard Herring?
We are all JF. Prepare to be incorporated.
>Anyway, welcome, JF ***smoooooch***
<blush>
-- Richard Herring
- Next message: Jason K. Lambrou: "Re: dialects vs separate languages (was: The most Latin ofRomance languages?)"
- Previous message: Jacques Guy: "Re: Seen on aus.politics"
- In reply to: Jacques Guy: "!!Re: More Phaistos Disk"
- Next in thread: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: !!Re: More Phaistos Disk"
- Reply: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: !!Re: More Phaistos Disk"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
