Re: Does Anyone Know what Dolf is on about? X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au

From: Group_moderator (moderator_at_usenet.com)
Date: 08/23/04 

Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 19:31:37 +1000

X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au

Qolon wrote:

> What I mean by the notion, that "<jguy@alphalink.com.au> is engaging in
> self-justification for his own corruption of soul..." is the view that his
> Roman Catholic belief system as claimed Christianity is otherwise reliant on
> Pythagorean number theory {which is itself derived from a Kabbalistic view
> of the 10 Commandments as Heb. DEREK, Gk. Hodos
>
> a) A way of doing, speaking, etc; adikos hodos lesai: the 'conduct' or
> 'measure' rather than the 'way of life'. In the philosophical sense is the
> 'way of enquiry, knowledge or method'
>
> b) Method, system; hodôi or kai hodos: methodically, systematically as the
> ways of all kinds
>
> c) Of the Christian faith, doctrine, teachings and its followers;
>
> d) The undertaking or making of ethical decisions according to right
> thinking; it denotes a man's religious attitude or development;
>
> e) The will and ways of God concerning his providential dealings, purpose
> and acts: Hodos kurios - the walk commanded by God;
>
> f) The Covenant as Decalogue being the commandments or laws accepted among
> the Gentiles
>
> }. But that it has no teleological argument and justification for the
> taxonomical origin of Latin as substantiation of an otherwise symbolic,
> insubstantial, axiomatic and superstitious theological perspective, that is
> provided as the Natural, Regulative, Metempirical and Jurisprudent
> Philosophical origin of language, it's relationship to the theory of number
> and considerations as to whether a heuristic {a method of solving problems;
> one for which no algorithm heretofore exists and therefore depends on
> inductive (ie. some reaction within the organism) reasoning from past
> experience of similar problems} exists that is attributed to a chronological
> based hermeneutic as 'a priori'.
>
> Therefore, he is doing all in his power, to discredit those who divulge his
> lack and religious fraud.
>
> - dolf
>
> "Qolon" <telos@bigpond.com> wrote in message news:...
> And we can see from this latest response by "Jacques Guy"
> <jguy@alphalink.com.au>, he is engaging in self-justification for his own
> corruption of soul...
>
> As I said previously it is afteral "An integral model-namely, all-quadrant,
> all-level noumenon (ie. a neural linguistic vMeme / Moment mathematical
> kabbalistic paradigm known as the Wilber model as deployed within the Spiral
> Dynamics Architecture)-that attempts to provide a framework in which all of
> those 'facts', if you will, can be accommodated. The facts, that is, of both
> interior realities and exterior realities, 'spiritual' experiences and
> 'scientific' experiences, subjective realities and objective realities. It
> finds ample room for the traditional Great Chain of Being {ie. as
> nomenclature: #1 - Seraphim, #2 - Cherubim, #3 - Thrones, #4 - Dominions,
> #5 - Virtues, #6 - Powers, #7 - Principalities, #8 - Arch-Angels, #9 -
> Angels} and Knowing-from matter or mind to body to soul to spirit: '...the
> Lord-YaHWeH God-'ELOHIYM (mind) formed man of the dust of the ground body),
> and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life (spirit); and man became a
> living soul (soul).'[Genesis 2:7] But it plugs those realities into
> empirical facts in a definite and specifiable fashion." [© 2000 Ken Wilber,
> 'A Theory of Everything - An Integral Vision for Business, Politics, Science
> & Spirituality', Shamhala Publications, Boston p 66-73]
>
> - dolf
>
> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 21:07:40 -0700
> From: Jacques Guy <jguy@alphalink.com.au>
> Message-ID: <4126CA8C.C0A@alphalink.com.au>
>
> Mike Girouard wrote:
>
>
>>Scientist says numeracy theories don't add up
>>By Roger Highfield, Science Editor (Daily Telegraph)
>>(Filed: 20/08/2004)
>
>
> Lovely garbage.
>
>
>>Language moulds our thoughts so much that we cannot conceptualise
>>ideas for which we do not have words, according to an American
>>researcher.
>
>
> Sure, ever heard of a certain chemist with a funny name
> who dreamt a certain molecule, and happened to be right?
>
> And BTW, how did the notion of "phoneme" ever come into
> being? We could not conceptualize it when there was no
> word for it, could we? So, some smart cookie thought:
> "Pho-neme, pho-neme, hey! that's a nice-sounding word!"
> And he said unto himself: "Let 'phoneme' designate those
> little things with the sort of raffia work base, that
> has an attachment". Now, of, course, it was difficult
> to get the meaning across to the rest of the world, which
> had no word for "phoneme" and therefore could not
> conceptualize it. And there, folks, lieth the origin
> of modern phonology. On en apprend tous les jours, hein?
>
>
>>Dr Gordon's work, reported in the journal Nature
>
>
>
> Ah! Nature, Nature of course!
>
>
>>The tribe has words for "one" and "two" - and "one" can also mean
>>"roughly one"
>
>
> Oh yes, "roughly one". Roughly one what?
>
>
>
>>The Piraha have little social structure, no art, and they barter
>>instead of using currency.
>
>
> Wow! Fancy that! How primitive! Has Arsehole Emeritus Gordon
> ever lived anywhere real? Has he ever heard of WWII, when
> city dwellers would barter with country dwellers for food?
> How the *** can the Piraha barter if they can't tell "one"
> from "roughly one", eh?
>
>
>>Their language is limited to just 10
>>consonants and vowels.
>
>
> And two tones.
>
> So what? What do you think makes you computer tick? A number
> system limited to two, count'em, two digits, that's what.
>
> Now let's hear it for !Xu, with some 80 consonants and
> 24 vowels. What's Arsehole Emeritus Gordon's precious
> English compared to that, huh?
>
>
>>Dr Lisa Feigenson, a psychologist from Johns Hopkins University in
>>Baltimore, Maryland, said that Dr Gordon's study was "fantastic".
>
>
>
> Right. As in "fantasy".
>
>
>>"That is, we can have a sense of threeness without having a word for
>>three, but we cannot have a sense of fourness and beyond without the
>>words to express it," Prof Butterworth said.
>
>
> Keep up the good work, Butterworth. The Holy Trinity is right
> round the corner, and our Pope is famous for canonizing
> people as if there was no to-morrow. Ave, St Butterworth, ora
> pro nobis!
>
>
>
>>With compliments to the group,
>
>
> Merci! Comme super connerie, ça bat même les élucubrations
> de Barry Fell! Bravo, encore, encore, encore!
>
> "Qolon" <telos@bigpond.com> wrote in message
> news:MOcWc.3510$D7.1629@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> In response to your continuing public abuse as claimed religiousity made at
> 1022 hrs [#63 *, #58, #48, #7 - Intentional Reversal/ Dimming Radiance,
> (#29, #53)] as Jesse - gift; oblation; one who is ] on 23 August, 2004 [#22
> *, #74, #56, #66 - Strategic Reversal/ Putting Oneself Behind, (#36, #46)]
> as Obed - a servant; workman {(Nature amended in its Nature / Autonomous
> Nature)}]
>
> "Yi-he-wu-he is not an adaptation of 'Yahweh', but a 'spelling out' of the
> tetragrammaton, just as if we said 'why, aitch, double-u, aitch'. 'Yahweh'
> would be Ya-wei, and 'Jehovah' Zhe-hou-fa." [Jacques Guy
> <jguy@alphalink.com.au> Prohibition on writing the name of God at 04:15:34
> hrs [#34, #65, #63 *, #33 - Achievable Goals/ The Virtue of Discrimation,
> (#16, #66) as Shelah - Sprout/That breaks; that unties; that undresses {10,
> 7, 30, = 47, #5} {Nature Contains Nature (Act of Nature)}] on 24 Feb 2004
> [#1, #5, #61, #81 - Making the Essence Clear/ Propounding the Essential,
> (#77, #5 *) as {Act of Nature - Eptiel / Enkyklie} {1, 10, 70, = 81, #4}]
>
>
> "This is Shem Hemaphorash {ie. The Divine Name of Extension}. It is the
> beginning of all the names. The beginning is the highest name and the
> lowest. Of the secret of male and female [and of] Berash Adam Vochoveh. Of
> the name of four letters: Yod He Vav Heh. The great and honored name is the
> knowledge of our existence, the root of the invocation. Change the beginning
> of all existence. Bind to deliver by the tried and proven essence of truth.
> Of favorable existence, all was created by the wisdom and desire, according
> to the decree of wisdom, the desire to bless. Decree the name (which are in
> Gematria equivalent) of the twelve signs (over chaos), of twelve written
> words combined {seemingly symbolically related to unity of the 10 Sefirot
> (Number) as continuum being a 6 dimensional notion of space, time, morality
> and gender containing opposites}.
>
> YHVH {south - Chesed/Mercy}, YHHV, YVHH {above - Netzach/Victory}, HVHY,
> HVYH {north - Gevurah/Strength}, HHYV, VHYH {west - Yesod/Foundation}, VHHY,
> VYHH {east - Tiferet/Beauty}, HYHV, HYVH {below - Hod/Splendour}, HHVY [©
> 2000 Steve Savedow, The Sepher Rezial: The Book of the Angel Raziel, p 144,
> 168]
>
> Being further sustained by a symbolic theology derived from the Pythagorean
> (c. 580-500 BCE) usage of the Triangulation of Number: n(n+1)/2 as
> transposition applied to the Tetragrammation of 'YHWH' and known as the root
> of nature or Tetractys, the 'Holy Four-fold Form'.
>
> SWEAR AN OATH AND REVERE {ie. Y + YH + YHV + YHVH}:
> Yod (10) as 4(4+1)/2 = 10 + (Kether - Prime Directive as Sefirot/Number)
> Yod (10) + He (5) as 5(5+1)/2 = 15 + (Chokmah - Wisdom/Throne of Glory)
> Yod (10) + He (5) + Vav (6) as 6(6+1)/2 = 21 + (Binah - Understanding of
> Angels)
> Yod (10) + He (5) + Vav (6) + He (5) = 26 (Malkhut - Dwelling of God in
> Creation)
>
> As the total of 72 (ie. 472 BCE) [c. 57/58 CE in Romans 2:17-24] and
> existing prior to the year 457 BCE (72J2W1D) from whence the Hebrews had
> made several population repatriations to Jerusalem from Babylonian exile [c.
> 400 BCE in Ezra 2:1-2; Nehemiah 7:6-7; 450 BCE in Esther 9:6-15].
>
> The Dead Sea Scroll fragment '4Q390 as Prophetic Apocryphon or
> 4QPseudo-Moses' provides an alternate theological view, in that it speaks of
> these repatriations associated with Jubilee chronology ('in the seventh
> Jubilee' as 343 or 73 years: the 'oth {sign, signal; a distinguishing mark;
> banner; remembrance; miraculous sign; omen; warning; token, ensign,
> standard, miracle, proof} character as (7^3 - 7² years) produces a value of
> 294 [6J] years as a dynamic ratio within its result of 120J (ie. 20 x 6J)
> Jubilees + 120 [2J3W1D] years [ie. Jubilee & Torah @ Sinai in [50J] + 12 x
> [6J] + [3W1D] = 6,000 years {ie.
>
> This notion that Divine Providence is determined by the 'oth {signs}
> chronological principle as being 6J or 294 years may be associated with the
>
> Telos as the Topical year/day solar eclipse Monday 25 December, 2000 + 6
> days = 122J3W1D: "For eclipses are a natural consequence of the rules which
> regulate the divine natures of the sun and moon; and they are indications
> either of the impending death of some king, or the destruction of some city
> [or] to such events as the consequences of the omens {'oth-signs} which I
> have now been mentioning. ... For as the sun and moon exist in consequence
> of Providence, so also do all things in heaven, even though we are unable to
> trace out accurately the respective natures and powers of each, therefore,
> reduced to silence about them." [Philo of Alexandria 20BCE-50CE, On
> Providence II: 50, 52]
>
> }]) transpiring with both Zerubbabel's rebuilding of the 2nd Jerusalem
> Temple ('those who will be the first to go up from the land of captivity in
> order to build the temple') under an initial decree from King Darius I in
> circa 520 BCE [#49, #46, #59, #39 - Achieving Oneness/ The Root of Order/
> #57, #25]. And under subsequent decree from King Artaxerxes in 72J2W1D = 457
> BCE [#9, #31, #51, #61 - Virtuosity at Using 'Beneath'/ The Virtue of
> Humility/ #59, #23], allowing the restoration of the Judicatory and
> Administrative Process in accordance with the Laws of Moses: ('I will speak
> to them and send them a precept / commandment and they will understand all
> that they have abandoned, they and their fathers').
>
> If you don't have the spiritual depth to address such esoteric notions, your
> mimicry is not my problem and insufficient grounds for you to engage in
> impunity as you do as an alibi for a spiritual life, wisdom and intelligence
> as understanding.
>
> It is afteral "An integral model-namely, all-quadrant, all-level noumenon
> (ie. known as the Wilber model as deployed within the Spiral Dynamics
> Architecture)-that attempts to provide a framework in which all of those
> 'facts', if you will, can be accommodated. The facts, that is, of both
> interior realities and exterior realities, 'spiritual' experiences and
> 'scientific' experiences, subjective realities and objective realities. It
> finds ample room for the traditional Great Chain of Being {ie. as
> nomenclature: #1 - Seraphim, #2 - Cherubim, #3 - Thrones, #4 - Dominions,
> #5 - Virtues, #6 - Powers, #7 - Principalities, #8 - Arch-Angels, #9 -
> Angels} and Knowing-from matter or mind to body to soul to spirit: '...the
> Lord-YaHWeH God-'ELOHIYM (mind) formed man of the dust of the ground (body),
> and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life (spirit); and man became a
> living soul (soul).'[Genesis 2:7] But it plugs those realities into
> empirical facts in a definite and specifiable fashion." [© 2000 Ken Wilber,
> 'A Theory of Everything - An Integral Vision for Business, Politics, Science
> & Spirituality', Shamhala Publications, Boston p 66-73]
>
> It is a wonder that "Infidel" isn't familar with it, as they claim to be 'In
> Christ'--it's otherwise known as the 'Mind of Christ': "Howbeit we
> speak-LALEO wisdom-SOPHIA {ie. Telos (122J3W1D) = Arch (22/7 as 3W1D) + c²}
> among them-EN that are perfect-TELEOIS: yet-DE not the wisdom-SOPHIA of
> this-TOUTOU world-AION, nor-OUDE of the princes-ARCHON of this-TOUTOU
> world-AION, that come-KATARGEO to nought-KATARGEO:
>
> But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden wisdom, which
> God ordained before the world unto our glory: Which none of the princes of
> this world knew: for had they known it, they would not have crucified the
> Lord of glory.
>
> But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered
> into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love
> him. But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit
> searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God. For what man knoweth the
> things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things
> of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God. Now we have received, not the
> spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the
> things that are freely given to us of God.
>
> Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth,
> but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with
> spiritual. But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of
> God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because
> they are spiritually discerned. But he that is spiritual judgeth all things,
> yet he himself is judged of no man. For who hath known the mind of the Lord,
> that he may instruct him? But we have the mind of Christ." [1 Corinthians
> 2:7-16]
>
> - dolf
> - < http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/kabbalah/patent.html#AXIOM4 >
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jacques Guy" <jguy@alphalink.com.au>
> Newsgroups: aus.religion.christian,aus.politics
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 3:22 AM
> Subject: Re: Does Anyone Know what Dolf is on about?
>
>
> "Jacques Guy" <jguy@alphalink.com.au> wrote in message
> news:412A27D5.570F@alphalink.com.au...
> infidel wrote:
>
>
>>So what's he on about
>>Maybe he's is just borderline.........
>
>
> No, what gives it away is the layout of those
> two web pages. The fellow _has_ flipped his lid.
> Those people are not uncommon. Adolf Wölfli is an example
> ("http://www.mam.org/collections/folk_detail_wolfli.htm")
> Wölfli has flipped his lid but not, for instance,
> Luigi Serafini ("http://www.almaleh.com/serafini-e.htm")
>
> The difference is that:
>
> 1. One (here Wölfli) is driven by his obsession,
> the other not (Serafini was/is an architect
> and his "Codex Seraphinianus" did not interfere
> with his career: "http://www.futurarium.com/20022003/ls_e.htm")
>
> 2. The work of one is without merit (no artistic merit,
> no imagination)
>
> This Dolf Boek is visibly driven by some obsession, and
> his stuff is just a mishmash of ill-digested kabbalah
> and numerology, without merit, imagination, nor interest.
> It can only be considered interesting as an illustration of
> some mental disease.
>
> "Jacques Guy" <jguy@alphalink.com.au> wrote in message
> news:412A8AE2.5B86@alphalink.com.au...
> Readers of aus.tv and aus.cars would breathe a sigh
> of relief, but they won't know that I've left their
> newsgroups out.
>
> We know. The story has been doing the rounds on sci.lang
>
> Stuff and nonsense from a publicity-hungry ignoramus,
> nothing new. In fact, we are pretty used to this rubbish.
> It re-surfaces periodically.
>
> Blah blah blah. If that Gordon fraud had really wanted to test those
> Indians' intellectual abilities, he would have taught them to count
> in the first place. Languages without a number system abound.
> There are many such languages in South America, and many in
> Australia. They have managed very nicely without for tens of thousands
> of years, thank you very much. And they have no trouble learning to
> count, and no trouble counting like you and me, when the need arises.
>
> So that "The present study" certainly does not "represent a rare
> and perhaps unique case for strong linguistic determinism" as
> "Gordon wrote." At best this Gordon is an imbecile who does not
> know how to conduct a psychological experiment. At worst he is
> a lying scroundrel.
>
> It is little surprise that madmen such as Dolf Boek should be
> attracted to the snake oil distilled by the like of this Gordon
> character.
>
> QOLON NOTE:
> You might take note of the recent article in the Washington Post concerning
> your constraints in thinking and especially with transcendental,
> metaphysical and esoteric thought of a kabbalistic nature (eg. the idea of
> inner or absence of soul), being due to an unfamiliarity with the language
> that might define those concepts: "Does language sometimes define the
> content of thought? Are there people who cannot entertain certain ideas
> because their language does not have the words to express them? Are there
> concepts that cannot be translated into some languages?
>
> These questions have vexed linguists and neuroscientists for years. The
> general feeling has been that language does not limit cognition. However, a
> new study in the online version of Science suggests that the prevailing
> notion may not be correct.
>
> Peter Gordon, a behavioral scientist at Columbia University, conducted an
> unusual set of experiments with seven adults of the 200-member Piraha tribe
> of Amazonian Indians in Brazil.
>
> The tribe's counting system consists of three words -- one that means
> "roughly one," one that means "a small quantity" and one that means "many."
>
> Gordon asked the Piraha subjects to perform various tasks in which
> performance would be greatly enhanced by the ability to count. These
> included laying out the same number of nuts or sticks that he had laid out;
> distinguishing two boxes whose only difference was the number of fish drawn
> on their tops; and knowing when a tin can was empty after watching the
> researcher put nuts into the can and then withdraw them one by one.
>
> Gordon found that the Piraha were essentially incapable of following or
> accounting for more than three objects. When a task involved larger
> numbers -- even five or six -- the subjects' answers were little more than
> guesses, even though they clearly understood the tests and were working hard
> on them.
>
> He attributed this surprising finding to the fact the Piraha "have no
> privileged name for the singular quantity" -- in other words, no one, no
> notion of an integer.
>
> "The present study represents a rare and perhaps unique case for strong
> linguistic determinism" -- the idea that language determines thought --
> Gordon wrote." [© 2004 Washington Post, David Brown "They Don't Have a Word
> for It ", Monday, August 23, 2004; Page A06 cf: <
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25018-2004Aug22.html >]
>
> I've re-included the follow-ups as the religious vilification which I was
> commenting on and you are attempting to justify came from there.
>
> Graham W, Go mind your own business elsewhere.
>
> - dolf
>
> "Graham W" <zebedee@alphalink.commercial.au> wrote in message
> news:41299034@news.alphalink.com.au...
> I'm no neo-fascist and I didn't "come out of the woodwork".
>
> You crossposted your nonsense into a newsgroup I read. I removed the
> crosspost in the followups, yet you've gone to the trouble of putting it
> back in. If you don't want me to reply, don't cosspost your rubbish into
> the newsgroup I read. Simple.
>
> QOLON NOTE:
> I don't have to wonder when it comes to you, mention neo-fascists as
> pretension in the greatest degree, and it has a certain reasonance or
> dissonance with their simple minded mates, [who] come out of the wood-work
> [to] give them a hand at hurling religious values vilification of
> seventh-day Sabbath observant Christians--it's a form of anti-semitism and
> un-Constitutional behaviour --Lest we forget!
>
> - dolf
>
> "Graham W" <zebedee@alphalink.commercial.au> wrote in message
> news:41296df7$1@news.alphalink.com.au...
> Qolon wrote:
>
>>Here is a buttwipe {'Arsenokoites' as defiler of themselves + 'Malakos' as
>>soft and delicate tissue} for you!
>>
>>- dolf
>
>
> And you wonder why no one will take you seriously???
>
> Date:
> 18:24:04 = [#54, #19, #27, #28 - Opposites and Primitivism/ Returning to
> Simplicity, (#56, #26)] as Eleazar - help of God, court of God {Nature
> contains Nature / Focus - Olithiel / Orion}
> Thu, 29 Apr 2004 = [#18, #11, #78, #58 * - Political Reversal/ Adaptation to
> Change, (#2, #80)] as Methuselah - Man of the dart/javelin (weapon, missile,
> sprout)/ He has sent his death {Focus / Transforming Nature}]
> From: Graham W <zebedee@alphalink.au>
>
> Qolon wrote:
>
>>Dear newsgroup readers,
>
> ...
>
>>As I said previously, it appears the individual zoot suffers from
>>self-delusions and is now resorting to fabrications, all in an attempt to
>>escape the moniker of insignificance.
>
>
> Dolf, you claim zoot suffers from self delusions.
>
> Clearly if he's deluded he will be unable to properly judge for himself
> whether he is deluded. Your opinion that he is deluded is just one
> opinion among the many people who might have read these threads.
>
> So lets take a poll.
>
> Who thinks zoot is deluded?
>
> Now bear in mind, if zoot might not realise he's deluded, maybe you might
> also be deluded and not realise it?
>
> So, just in case, who thinks Dolf is deluded?
>
>
> Finally, perhaps I'm deluding myself, and you're all sane? So who thinks
> I'm deluded?
>
> 8-)
>
> (I must be deluded, trying to reason with Dolf, so I vote:
>
> Zoot, Not deluded,
> Dolf, deluded
> Me, unqualified to vote about myself.
>
> QOLON NOTES:
> Its hard to justify why you should participate in continued religious
> vilification of seventh-day Sabbath observant Christians--it's a form of
> anti-semitism and un-Constitutional behaviour that only a neo-fascist would
> engage in, second only to Frank Cole's deliberate with-holding of truth as
> denial of justice made under the guise of Australian mateship--Lest we
> forget!
>
> - dolf
>
> "ferret" <microsoft.hell@localhost.microsft.com> wrote in message
> news:2ossihFcrosdU1@uni-berlin.de...
> rufus wrote:
>
>>I have spent some time analysing his web pages and I think he is
>
> borderline
>
>>genius.
>
>
> WTF, he should hire one of those kids in kindergarden to improve the
> web site !. And hire somebody else who is not colour blind.
>
> I would like to nominate it for worst web design EVER.
>
> "She's always looked like the evil stepmother on a jerry springer show. But
> looking at her now, time hasn't been very kind to her at all. She could play
> the lead in a horror movie, won't need any makeup." [ferret
> <nobody@localhost.microsft.com> 'Lindy Chamberlain' at 11:44:59 hrs [#39,
> #39, #73, #52 - So What?/ Returning to the Origin, (#42, #40) as Abijah -
> the Lord is my father {(Transforming Nature)}] on 09 Jul 2004 [#28, #23,
> #55, #54 - Culturing Perspectives/ The Cultivation of Intuition, (#26, #56)]
> as Jacob - He takes by the heel, he supplants/ That supplants, undermines;
> the heel {10, 10, 10, = 30, #2}{Totality of Nature or Autonomous Nature
> (Focus / Nature contains Nature)}]
>
> "Remember that she, and the ex husband, ex SDA pastor, and Qolon (dolf),
> belong to the Seventh Day Adventist Church. Eat your WeetBix! LOL!!!!"
> ["infidel" <somebody@somewhere.co> 'Lindy Chamberlain' at 19:05:06 [#7, #56
> *, #60, #60 - Skill at Ruling/ How to Maintain One's Place, (#67, #15)] as
> Jacob - He takes by the heel, he supplants/ That supplants, undermines; the
> heel {10, 10, 30, = 50, #1} {Ratio / Nature surmounts Nature - Xiphiel /
> Xonopnoenax}] on 09 Jul 2004 [#28, #23, #55, #54 - Culturing Perspectives/
> The Cultivation of Intuition, (#26, #56)] as Jacob - He takes by the heel,
> he supplants/ That supplants, undermines; the heel {10, 10, 10, = 30,
> #2}{Totality of Nature or Autonomous Nature (Focus / Nature contains
> Nature)}]
>
> <vObj iDate="Mon Aug 23 2004 10:37:34 hrs">
> <tx><io telos="706">WTF</io><po>,</po></tx>
> <tx><io telos="13">he</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="502">should</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="112">hire</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="115">one</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="66">of</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="373">those</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="133">kids</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="59">in</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="335">kindergarden</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="260">to</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="674">improve</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="213">the</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="507">web</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="314">site</io><po> !.</po></tx>
> <tx><io telos="55">And</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="112">hire</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="971">somebody</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="140">else</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="568">who</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="109">is</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="310">not</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="543">colour</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="95">blind</io><po>.</po></tx>
> <tx><io telos="9">I</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="894">would</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="64">like</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="260">to</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="415">nominate</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="209">it</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="156">for</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="950">worst</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="507">web</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="175">design</io></tx>
> <tx><io telos="500">EVER</io><po>.</po></tx>
> </vObj>
>
> Total for Sentence: 11427 % 81 = #6
>
> At 10:37:34 hrs = [#63, #58, #48, #7 * - Intentional Reversal/ Dimming
> Radiance, (#29, #53)] as Jesse - gift; oblation; one who is]
> On = 23 Aug 2004 = [#22 *, #74, #56, #66 - Strategic Reversal/ Putting
> Oneself Behind, (#36, #46)] as Obed - a servant; workman {(Nature amended in
> its Nature / Autonomous
> Nature)}]
>
> #1 = [#6, #69, #20, #70 - Difficulty in Knowing How/ Difficult to
> Understand, (#76, #6)] {Form of Nature}]
> #2 = [#16, #6, #6, #57 - Laissez Faire Politics/ Simplicity In Habits, (#10,
> #72)]
> #3 = [#16, #6, #6, #57 - Laissez Faire Politics/ Simplicity In Habits, (#10,
> #72)]
> #4 = [#61, #73, #57, #6 - The Superiority of the Female/ The Completion of
> Form, (#37, #45)]
> #5 = [#76, #78, #62, #12 - The Numbing Effect of the Conventional/
> Abstaining from Desire, (#6, #76) as Kenan - Fixed, (nestlings; figuratively
> a chamber or dwelling:-nest, room)/ buyer; owner
> {Engendering Nature / Nature amended in its Nature}]
> #6 = [#6, #69, #20, #70 - Difficulty in Knowing How/ Difficult to
> Understand, (#76, #6)] {Form of Nature}]
>
> - dolf
> - < http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/kabbalah/patent.html#AXIOM4 >
>
>
>
>
>
>