Re: dialects vs separate languages (was: The most Latin of Romance
From: Peter T. Daniels (grammatim_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 08/24/04
- Next message: André Keshav: "Re: Can anyone translate English to Aramaic?"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: dialects vs separate languages"
- In reply to: Dmitri: "Re: dialects vs separate languages (was: The most Latin of Romance"
- Next in thread: David Brandon Thomas: "Re: dialects vs separate languages (was: The most Latin of Romance"
- Reply: David Brandon Thomas: "Re: dialects vs separate languages (was: The most Latin of Romance"
- Reply: Dmitri: "Re: dialects vs separate languages (was: The most Latin of Romance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 20:41:50 GMT
Dmitri wrote:
>
> >From: vaelynphi@aol.comZOT
>
> >Yes, I'm afraid AOL isn't capable of cross-posting... you have to make
> >individual posts to each group.
>
> Now if we can have ALL ISPs have the same restriction, then the likes of PTD
> can bitch and moan about something important.
If that were so, we wouldn't get nonsensical crap from soc.culture.* and
acrimonious bitching from a.u.e. all the time.
-- Peter T. Daniels grammatim@att.net
- Next message: André Keshav: "Re: Can anyone translate English to Aramaic?"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: dialects vs separate languages"
- In reply to: Dmitri: "Re: dialects vs separate languages (was: The most Latin of Romance"
- Next in thread: David Brandon Thomas: "Re: dialects vs separate languages (was: The most Latin of Romance"
- Reply: David Brandon Thomas: "Re: dialects vs separate languages (was: The most Latin of Romance"
- Reply: Dmitri: "Re: dialects vs separate languages (was: The most Latin of Romance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]