Re: dialects vs separate languages
From: Dmitri (uiesperanto_at_aol.com)
Date: 08/25/04
- Next message: Dmitri: "Re: dialects vs separate languages (was: The most Latin of Romance"
- Previous message: Ben Zimmer: "Re: Boggle Re: Scientist says numeracy theories don't add up"
- In reply to: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: dialects vs separate languages"
- Next in thread: ++: "Re: dialects vs separate languages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 25 Aug 2004 18:08:38 GMT
>From: "Peter T. Daniels"
>Where did I call you stupid, dimmy? I said that the Greek idiots'
>postings are stupid.
yuh-huh....sure......and you got a bridge to sell me, right?
>Though only becoming aware 2 days ago of a major deficiency in your
>newsreader that you've been using for months does say _something_ about
>you.
It says nothing about me; however, it says much about AOL.....particularly the
fact that NOTHING shows in the read news function that indicates crosspostings
are automatically deleted.
Again: so stuff it.
Dmitri
Iowa City, IA
Views expressed in this post are not necessarily the official views of the
Eastern Iowa Esperanto League, the Esperanto League for North America or even
the Esperanto movement as a whole. Supposed rudeness is mine alone. (DRM)
- Next message: Dmitri: "Re: dialects vs separate languages (was: The most Latin of Romance"
- Previous message: Ben Zimmer: "Re: Boggle Re: Scientist says numeracy theories don't add up"
- In reply to: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: dialects vs separate languages"
- Next in thread: ++: "Re: dialects vs separate languages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|