Re: Pinyin, Mandarin [was: Re: Chinese 'Dialects']
From: André Keshav (andre_dumarc_at_hotte-mail.com)
Date: 08/26/04
- Next message: LEE Sau Dan: "Re: Chinese 'Dialects'"
- Previous message: Dorian West: "Re: dialects vs separate languages (was: The most Latin of Romance languages?)"
- In reply to: Peter Dy: "Re: Pinyin, Mandarin [was: Re: Chinese 'Dialects']"
- Next in thread: Jim Heckman: "Re: Pinyin, Mandarin [was: Re: Chinese 'Dialects']"
- Reply: Jim Heckman: "Re: Pinyin, Mandarin [was: Re: Chinese 'Dialects']"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:09:20 +0200
"Peter Dy" <peterdy@sbcglobal.net>
| The "ch" in "ich is not velar; it's palatal.
|
| The "ch" in "Buch" is velar.
Yes, sorry. But "ch" in ich is not quite the same anyway as Pinyin x: c cedilla
and s cedilla respectively.
- Next message: LEE Sau Dan: "Re: Chinese 'Dialects'"
- Previous message: Dorian West: "Re: dialects vs separate languages (was: The most Latin of Romance languages?)"
- In reply to: Peter Dy: "Re: Pinyin, Mandarin [was: Re: Chinese 'Dialects']"
- Next in thread: Jim Heckman: "Re: Pinyin, Mandarin [was: Re: Chinese 'Dialects']"
- Reply: Jim Heckman: "Re: Pinyin, Mandarin [was: Re: Chinese 'Dialects']"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|