Re: universal concept list
From: Pekka Karjalainen (pkarjala_at_paju.oulu.fi)
Date: 08/27/04
- Next message: Miguel Carrasquer: "Re: dialects vs separate languages"
- Previous message: André Keshav: "Re: Pinyin, Mandarin [was: Re: Chinese 'Dialects']"
- In reply to: J.D.F. Stone: "Re: universal concept list"
- Next in thread: Nigel Greenwood: "Re: universal concept list"
- Reply: Nigel Greenwood: "Re: universal concept list"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:20:13 +0000 (UTC)
In article <uhdqp4oyj.fsf.jdfs@softhome.net>, J.D.F. Stone wrote:
> pkarjala@paju.oulu.fi (Pekka Karjalainen) writes:
>
>> The Finnish word for one is "taajuussanasto".
>
> I shudder to think what the Finnish word for two is.
>
> HAW! HAW! HAW!
>
> [...]
[pretending to not get it]
Oh, it is "taajuussanastopari" or "taajuussanastokaksikko". Most often
we would say "kaksi taajuussanastoa", though.
-- Pekka Karjalainen :P
- Next message: Miguel Carrasquer: "Re: dialects vs separate languages"
- Previous message: André Keshav: "Re: Pinyin, Mandarin [was: Re: Chinese 'Dialects']"
- In reply to: J.D.F. Stone: "Re: universal concept list"
- Next in thread: Nigel Greenwood: "Re: universal concept list"
- Reply: Nigel Greenwood: "Re: universal concept list"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
