Re: What's so archaic about Lithuania?
From: Anita (kodols_at_aol.com)
Date: 08/27/04
- Next message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: Told today"
- Previous message: cellus Purfluxius: "Re: Constructed Origins"
- In reply to: Uno Hu: "Re: What's so archaic about Lithuania?"
- Next in thread: Eugene Holman: "Re: What's so archaic about Lithuania?"
- Reply: Eugene Holman: "Re: What's so archaic about Lithuania?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 27 Aug 2004 09:21:54 -0700
lorad474@cs.com (Uno Hu) wrote in message news:<9dff2144.0408260924.44d8eeb0@posting.google.com>...
> Btw.. the alternative form of the Latvian 'vilks' is 'vilkis'.
> This doesn't sink your rubber duckey, does it? Ha ha.
> Uno Hu
Where in Latvian do you get "vilkis" as an alternative form of
"vilks"? Keeping in mind that "that's what my family says" doesn't
qualify as an alternative form.
Anita
- Next message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: Told today"
- Previous message: cellus Purfluxius: "Re: Constructed Origins"
- In reply to: Uno Hu: "Re: What's so archaic about Lithuania?"
- Next in thread: Eugene Holman: "Re: What's so archaic about Lithuania?"
- Reply: Eugene Holman: "Re: What's so archaic about Lithuania?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]