Re: Linguists who have gone a bit...eccentric?
From: Rolleston (rolleston_at_tiscali.co.uk)
Date: 08/30/04
- Next message: Jason K. Lambrou: "Re: dialects vs separate languages in the FTCOG"
- Previous message: Anita: "Re: What's so archaic about Lithuania?"
- In reply to: Merlijn De Smit: "Re: Linguists who have gone a bit...eccentric?"
- Next in thread: Merlijn De Smit: "Re: Linguists who have gone a bit...eccentric?"
- Reply: Merlijn De Smit: "Re: Linguists who have gone a bit...eccentric?"
- Reply: Jacques Guy: "Sheldrakiana (was: Linguists who have gone a bit...eccentric?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:03:52 +0100
Merlijn De Smit wrote:
[...]
>Add to this an
>unhealthy dose of Kuhn-reading (Kuhn's "Structure of Scientific
>revolutions" is a fine book but the downside is that every would-be
>Galileo knows it by heart) and eagerness to shift paradigms, and you
>usually have a very big mess on your hands.
Did you click the link?
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=site%3Awww.sheldrake.org+kuhn&meta=
R.
- Next message: Jason K. Lambrou: "Re: dialects vs separate languages in the FTCOG"
- Previous message: Anita: "Re: What's so archaic about Lithuania?"
- In reply to: Merlijn De Smit: "Re: Linguists who have gone a bit...eccentric?"
- Next in thread: Merlijn De Smit: "Re: Linguists who have gone a bit...eccentric?"
- Reply: Merlijn De Smit: "Re: Linguists who have gone a bit...eccentric?"
- Reply: Jacques Guy: "Sheldrakiana (was: Linguists who have gone a bit...eccentric?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|