OOOPPPP:SSSSS,a bit late

From: g-nome (mpcato_at_lafn.org)
Date: 08/31/04 

Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:03:13 -0700

"M. Ranjit Mathews" wrote:
>
> g-nome <mpcato@lafn.org> wrote in message news:<4126B45E.44875611@lafn.org>...
> > So much for my past comments on someone making a commentary
> > to their own comments as being a twice fold redundancy.
> > Such is life. Don't you think? I do.
> > g-nome wrote:
> > >
> > > Err, umm.----
> > > :
> > > :
> > > V
> > > If you must bicker and piss on each other, at least consider
> > > the commentary on Ladino below.
> > >
> >
> > > > >> *** yiddish. It's a *** language.
> > > > >
> > > > >Whatever that means.
> > > >
> > > > You know what it means. Linguistically, it's a complete
> > > > bastardisation.
> > > >
> > > > >And anyway, you're the one who chose to use it.
> > > >
> > > > It's the one language all jews seem to understand.
> > > >
> > >
> > > So none of you Yiddishe have ever heard of Ladino? As many
> > > or more Saphardim speak Ladino as Ashkenazim speak Yiddish.
> > > The Spanish, Moroccan, and most Mediterranean Jews use
> > > Ladino, or is this way off base.
> > > Ladino is closer to Aramaic and Hebrew than is Yiddish.
> > > Look for a Ladino speaker if finding out any kind of truth
> > > is somewhere in the original question.
> > >
> > > Shalom,
> > > Michael.
> > >
> >
> > After a bit of consideration and a visit to one of my neighbors,
> > the Fellashah, the Ethiopian Jews, still speak a language dialect
> > that is closer to Aramaic than any other dialect I've heard of.
>
> I've read that because they didn't have a Purim festival the Felasha
> were judged to have separated from the main body of Hebrews/ Jews
> before the Babylonian captivity. If this is so, when did they pick up
> Aramaic? Some time between the Assyrian invasion and the Babylonian
> captivity?

OOOOOPs, a bit late,
I am enamored of my Fellashah Lady Friend,
And do not wish to engage with her Ancient political history.
What has the Babylonian captivity to do with Aramaic? Have you
no idea exactly where the epigraphy, letters, language, disconnects from
the traditional Hebrew words or letters, or from the Hebrew language, to
the epigraphic History of the Israelites? I think not.
Please tell me of your Teachings. I have been Learning, not been taught,
of the change from Hebrew to and from the Aramaic to the Hebrew Letters.
The language of the Hebrews has been passed on down through history
through Oral History as Hebrew. The verbiage that was used at the time
of
Jeheshuah was called Aramaic.
Jesus, that is your name of your Meshiach, spoke a language that was
spoken all around the Levant. The Romans made sure that their, so called
conquered nations, had a collective language that the Romans understood.
The Ethiopian Peoples that worshiped "The NAME", spoke and did actually
write in Aramaic.
Such is the Lying "Big Picture" that you profess as reality are quite
wrong.
Aramaic is the language of those that "Chose" to worship the "ONE G-D",
in the period between 250 BCE and 250 CE.
I shall not state my beliefs on how the so called, Christians, changed
their Judaism from the beliefs in John the Baptists and
Jeheshuah Bar Joseph, to what the Catholics believe to be "THE TRUTH".
Any self proclaimed Meshiach is a false Meshiach.
Read your SJVB and compare it to any Hebrew translation of the Tenach.
Any self proclaimed Messiah is a false Messiah.
So has it been written and so it is the Word Of G-D.
I'm a Jew. So what? The Romans "Killed" your christ, not the Jews.
Pilate left the Killing to the corrupt Sanhedrin.
A corrupt collection of lawyers of the Cohanim, not the "true"
Priests, or "Cohanim" of "The Name".
OK, there was Herod Antipas, one jealous son of a bitch, but as a Jew,
who cares?
Such is my answer. Such is what I believe. It means nothing to anyone
who believes in any differences from my beliefs. So there it is.
Question it, or leave it lay. Go for it mate, such as it is.

   Shalom,
   Michael.