Re: Ossetians and Pashto similarities
From: Daniel (xenos_at_onetel.net.uk)
Date: 09/05/04
- Next message: Yago Campos: "Re: Spanish: Era versus Fue"
- Previous message: Brian M. Scott: "Re: universal concept list"
- In reply to: alexV: "Re: Ossetians and Pashto similarities"
- Next in thread: alexV: "Re: Ossetians and Pashto similarities"
- Reply: alexV: "Re: Ossetians and Pashto similarities"
- Reply: alexV: "Re: Ossetians and Pashto similarities"
- Reply: benlizross: "Re: Ossetians and Pashto similarities"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 5 Sep 2004 06:42:31 -0700
"alexV" <alexV7623@comcast.net> wrote in message news:<5tidnTDlssNA9qfcRVn-vg@comcast.com>...
> I should only add that I wish I had a better understanding of the matter
> myself. So far I have advanced so far as to see obvious inconsistencies (in
> others) when the material (genetic) evidence is not taken into account but I
> wish I could tell the *truth.* No, it is not the case. I cannot.
theres a tribe in amazonia goes by the name of nua-nua - i think
but my spelling needs apologies - im diagnosed dyslexic.
in other primitive tribes theres a man::woman division. the men are the
hunter gatherers and the woman folk nurse the young and carry out
othre homely duties. this tribe is diferent to the rest. the food that
they most value is the hearts and livers of 2 monkeys - pithecia monachus
and lagothrix lagothrica. arm-eye co ordination is vital to hunt
this prey because it lives way up in the rainforest canopy so they choose
the best hunters and they can be man OR woman.
how do they do it? when a child is born they they wait
for the first few words. if pepaqua is spoekn first the child gets
put in among the hundters and if metama in among the remainder.
dont look too smart does it? theres more. when tests were conducted on
the tribe turns out the hunters have a whole bunch of physiological
characteristiscs that makes them better hunters than the others.
and these characteristics are congenital - in plain talk it means they
were there at birth. so it looks a lot like theres a link between
first words said and huntin g ability - its a link between language
and genetic predisposition. ive been scratching my head o n that
for awhile but i cant figure it and this kind of work is not universally
accetped - the reaction here will have told you somehting about that.
imho this goes way back to the sixties and the polliticization of the
campus by librals. aw theyre full of talk about freedom and
individualizational ideals but deep down inside their dark core every
one of them wants every one of us to be just the same inside as them.
liberals - theyre not going to tell youu this - are communists at heart.
they need us to be the same else their five year plans wont work. a centrally
controlled state relies on the uniformity of the human psyche it cant
deal with real variation in temperament or aptitude. like so many identical
molecules in a cylinder we must react predictably to the regular push
of the piston that compresses us. when they hear that langauge
has a gentic component their utopian masterplan falls apart.
buut i hope the day will come one day - just like with galileo - when
the evidence is so strong it can not be denied. if we arent all
pliant workers in a soul-destroying collective by then.
|best regards|
.dan.
millenium II punctuation
- Next message: Yago Campos: "Re: Spanish: Era versus Fue"
- Previous message: Brian M. Scott: "Re: universal concept list"
- In reply to: alexV: "Re: Ossetians and Pashto similarities"
- Next in thread: alexV: "Re: Ossetians and Pashto similarities"
- Reply: alexV: "Re: Ossetians and Pashto similarities"
- Reply: alexV: "Re: Ossetians and Pashto similarities"
- Reply: benlizross: "Re: Ossetians and Pashto similarities"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|