Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?
From: Peter T. Daniels (grammatim_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 09/10/04
- Next message: Igor Sklar: "Re: Peterburg in other languages (was: More stupidities)"
- Previous message: Igor Sklar: "Re: The origin of "vermilion""
- In reply to: Rex F. May: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Next in thread: Rex F. May: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Reply: Rex F. May: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 13:50:46 GMT
Rex F. May wrote:
>
> in article 41419B3B.2388@worldnet.att.net, Peter T. Daniels at
> grammatim@worldnet.att.net wrote on 9/10/04 6:17 AM:
>
> > Good grief. Did you fall for one of those books that makes pictures out
> > of characters?
>
> Sounds like many of us have been misled, Peter. Set us straigh!
I don't know what pictograms underlie the character he was talking
about, but they weren't what he said they were.
Many books on "learning" a handful of characters try to make pictures
out of their present forms that relate to their present meaning, and
these pictures -- since they usually don't even respect the phonetic vs.
radical components -- have nothing to do with their origin.
-- Peter T. Daniels grammatim@att.net
- Next message: Igor Sklar: "Re: Peterburg in other languages (was: More stupidities)"
- Previous message: Igor Sklar: "Re: The origin of "vermilion""
- In reply to: Rex F. May: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Next in thread: Rex F. May: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Reply: Rex F. May: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|