Re: History of French
From: Ruud Harmsen (realemailseesite01_at_rudhar.com)
Date: 09/14/04
- Next message: M. Ranjit Mathews: "Re: Roots of English language"
- Previous message: Franz Gnaedinger: "Re: I wonder what the "Science" is in this Newsgroup"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Herman Rubin: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Herman Rubin: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 09:13:20 +0200
Mon, 13 Sep 2004 20:15:50 +0200: Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@hotmail.com>: in
sci.lang:
>Jean de Nikiou writes:
>
>> The imparfait of subjonctif is no more really learnt in french school
>> since 1968.
>
>French itself is not widely taught in French schools, judging from the
>way French people use the language.
>
>> "French" as educated foreigners knows it no more too. Often i see at
>> french tv some foreigners who speak french better than french people.
>> They use correct tenses and syntax whereas the main french people do not.
>> Why ?
>
>Because French public education is inadequate.
So you think people learn their native language in school, not in the
cradle? Strange.
-- Ruud Harmsen - http://rudhar.com
- Next message: M. Ranjit Mathews: "Re: Roots of English language"
- Previous message: Franz Gnaedinger: "Re: I wonder what the "Science" is in this Newsgroup"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Herman Rubin: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Herman Rubin: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|