Re: language origin, language evolution, evolutionary mutation
From: Jacques Guy (jguy_at_alphalink.com.au)
Date: 09/15/04
- Next message: Harlan Messinger: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: Harlan Messinger: "Re: Passion of the Christ, languages"
- In reply to: Yair Shimron: "language origin, language evolution, evolutionary mutation"
- Next in thread: Kleinecke: "Re: language origin, language evolution, evolutionary mutation"
- Reply: Kleinecke: "Re: language origin, language evolution, evolutionary mutation"
- Reply: Yair Shimron: "Re: language origin, language evolution, evolutionary mutation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 04:37:05 -0700
All right, it hangs together logically, nicely. But
it is all speculation. You have 43 propositions there,
none of which is more than speculation. Let's be
generous, and grant each a 50% chance of being
right. You have about one chance in 9,000,000,000,000
of being right.
- Next message: Harlan Messinger: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: Harlan Messinger: "Re: Passion of the Christ, languages"
- In reply to: Yair Shimron: "language origin, language evolution, evolutionary mutation"
- Next in thread: Kleinecke: "Re: language origin, language evolution, evolutionary mutation"
- Reply: Kleinecke: "Re: language origin, language evolution, evolutionary mutation"
- Reply: Yair Shimron: "Re: language origin, language evolution, evolutionary mutation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|