Re: History of French
From: Peter T. Daniels (grammatim_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 09/14/04
- Next message: Harlan Messinger: "Re: De (los) Estados Unidos"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:38:34 GMT
Mxsmanic wrote:
>
> Ruud Harmsen writes:
>
> > I don't think so. Any four year old child already has complete
> > command, including all the subtle details only native speakers can
> > fully appreciate, of its own native language.
>
> Completely false. Most children are still making serious mistakes in
> their native languages even at age ten. Many people never fully master
> their native languages.
That is an oxymoron.
> > Two senses of "grammar" are getting intermigled here:
> > 1) What any native knows and applies automatically
> > 2) Studying that grammar in hindsight, and teaching the results of
> > such studies.
>
> They are one and the same, but seen from different viewpoints.
That is bull***.
-- Peter T. Daniels grammatim@att.net
- Next message: Harlan Messinger: "Re: De (los) Estados Unidos"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]