Re: language origin, language evolution, evolutionary mutation
From: alexV (alexV7623_at_comcast.net)
Date: 09/14/04
- Next message: Nathan Sanders: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: pierre.levy: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Yair Shimron: "language origin, language evolution, evolutionary mutation"
- Next in thread: Miguel Carrasquer: "Re: language origin, language evolution, evolutionary mutation"
- Reply: Miguel Carrasquer: "Re: language origin, language evolution, evolutionary mutation"
- Reply: Yair Shimron: "Re: language origin, language evolution, evolutionary mutation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 19:38:42 -0400
"Yair Shimron" <ronish20@bezeqint.net> wrote in message
news:5a550450.0409141026.5c205b0f@posting.google.com...
> One Khoisan language preserves 141 sounds. This is possible because
> Khoisan people and languages have lived quite isolated.
Could anyone shed any light on this "fact" or fiction. I want to know more
about it. I just checked some links and found that they communicate in
clicks--a fairly known fact. What does he mean by "preserves 141 sounds?"
>From the biological standpoint the whole opus is trash.
- Next message: Nathan Sanders: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: pierre.levy: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Yair Shimron: "language origin, language evolution, evolutionary mutation"
- Next in thread: Miguel Carrasquer: "Re: language origin, language evolution, evolutionary mutation"
- Reply: Miguel Carrasquer: "Re: language origin, language evolution, evolutionary mutation"
- Reply: Yair Shimron: "Re: language origin, language evolution, evolutionary mutation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]