Re: History of French
From: Ruud Harmsen (realemailseesite01_at_rudhar.com)
Date: 09/15/04
- Next message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:36:48 +0200
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 06:29:50 +0200: Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@hotmail.com>: in
sci.lang:
>> Because no native speaker of Enlgish systematically says "not is
>> true", but plenty of native speakers systematically say "it ain't".
>
>Why are native speakers more correct than non-native speakers?
Is that a serious question?
>> It's not about permission. It's about defining what (the grammar of)
>> a language is. A natural language is defined by how its native
>> speakers use it, not by how non-native speakers use it.
>
>How are native speakers defined?
Those who learnt it from early childhood.
-- Ruud Harmsen - http://rudhar.com
- Next message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|