Re: History of French
From: Harlan Messinger (hmessinger.removethis_at_comcast.net)
Date: 09/15/04
- Next message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: adult language learners (was Re: History of French)"
- In reply to: Harlan Messinger: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Chergarj: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 15:03:48 -0400
Harlan Messinger <hmessinger.removethis@comcast.net> wrote:
>Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Harlan Messinger writes:
>>
>>> What is "their native language" if not "the language that they speak",
>>> regardless of how they learned it?
>>
>>It's the nominal language they have supposedly learned as their native
>>language. If you say that someone's native language is English, that
>>implies that he speaks and reads and writes a standard language called
>>English. If not, then it isn't English.
>
>What's this "standard language called English" that you're talking
>about? Does the ISO know about it?
>
>English is the language used by native English speakers. Among them,
>there is variation in the language, as is the case with every natural
>human language. The fact that a language is written and that a
>population is literate doesn't change this. Do you think there's no
>difference between the way literate US English speakers, for example,
>speak today and the way their counterparts did 50 years ago?
For that matter, I should ask you if you think people speak the way
they write.
-- Harlan Messinger Remove the first dot from my e-mail address. Veuillez ๔ter le premier point de mon adresse de courriel.
- Next message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: adult language learners (was Re: History of French)"
- In reply to: Harlan Messinger: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Chergarj: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|