Re: De (los) Estados Unidos
From: Brian M. Scott (b.scott_at_csuohio.edu)
Date: 09/16/04
- Next message: Yago Campos: "Re: language origin, language evolution, evolutionary mutation"
- Previous message: Yusuf B Gursey: "Re: About Tajik origin: are they Turkic or Iranian?"
- In reply to: Nigel Greenwood: "Re: De (los) Estados Unidos"
- Next in thread: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: De (los) Estados Unidos"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 13:11:10 -0400
On 16 Sep 2004 09:53:02 -0700, Nigel Greenwood
<ndsg_mmii@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in
<news:7a31b7bf.0409160853.4cfadeb8@posting.google.com> in
sci.lang:
> Des Small <des.small@bristol.ac.uk> wrote
> <...>
>> It is only with conscious effort that I can find it at all surprising
>> that the score *** for an innings in which a side was all out should
>> include one batsman with "not out" by their name.
> US readers should note that in cricket-playing countries "innings" is
> a singular noun.
... which is also its own plural.
Brian
- Next message: Yago Campos: "Re: language origin, language evolution, evolutionary mutation"
- Previous message: Yusuf B Gursey: "Re: About Tajik origin: are they Turkic or Iranian?"
- In reply to: Nigel Greenwood: "Re: De (los) Estados Unidos"
- Next in thread: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: De (los) Estados Unidos"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]